<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24342#M5196</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes . Deduped .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mauro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-14T09:46:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24333#M5191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;netapp-dr:/vol_W_FN_bexec: Failed to create secondary snapshot on netapp-dr:/vol_W_FN_bexec. Reason : Could not get creation time for snapshot 2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily on volume netapp-dr:/vol_W_FN_bexec &lt;SPAN style="color: #575757;"&gt;after 6 retries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #575757;"&gt;The jobs status is "partially failed". Tha snap was correctly created, but an "error" event was generated by operation manager.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #575757;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;netapp-dr&amp;gt; snap list vol_W_FN_bexec&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;Volume vol_W_FN_bexec&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type: lower-alpha;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;working...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; %/used&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; %/total date&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; name&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;----------&amp;nbsp; ----------&amp;nbsp; ------------&amp;nbsp; --------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; 0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jun 14 09:46&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="background: yellow;"&gt;2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily.20120614_094611_CEST&lt;/SPAN&gt; (snaplock)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; 0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jun 14 09:46 netapp-dr(0135079115)_vol_W_FN_bexec-base.3 (busy,snapvault)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;From the dpfm.log:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:46:13 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot &lt;SPAN style="background: yellow;"&gt;'2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily'&lt;/SPAN&gt; not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:47:14 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:48:15 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:49:16 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:50:17 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:51:18 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;giu 14 09:52:19 [dfpm:DEBUG]: [2296:0x2e0]: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;It searches for a different name.. It seems a bug...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24333#M5191</guid>
      <dc:creator>mauro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24337#M5193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this volume dedupe enabled ? Looks like you are running DFM version 5.0 is that right ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:36:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24337#M5193</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T09:36:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24342#M5196</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes . Deduped .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24342#M5196</guid>
      <dc:creator>mauro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T09:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24347#M5198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This basically means that your controller is overloaded.&amp;nbsp; Pls take a look at the below public report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=420257" title="http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=420257" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=420257&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a workaround in the NOTES section, which I am copy pasting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DFM 4.0D9 provides a workaround for ONTAP burt 354566.&amp;nbsp; When the default of 3 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; retries and 60 seconds between the retires in the current DFM code is not &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; enough, use these two hidden options in DFM 4.0D9 to allow users to set the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; retries and time period between the retries to allow for getting creation time &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; of the snapshot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Set hidden options from DFM command line:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dfm option set dpMaxSnapshotListingRetries=&amp;lt;retries&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dfm option set dpSnapshotListingRetryInterval=&amp;lt;time period between retries&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is no guarntee that it will solve the problem. It will only make DFM/Protection Manger wait longer before it timesout with the error you posted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:51:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24347#M5198</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T12:51:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24352#M5201</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve already tried with 6 retries .. but nothing change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems a bug because it searches for a different name:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At 9,46 a snap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jun 14 09:46&amp;nbsp; 2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily.20120614_094611_CEST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was created&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But ,at same time, it searches for a snap that doesn’t exist…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;giu 14 09:46:13 &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/84118#84118" target="_blank"&gt;Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes&lt;/A&gt;: &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/84118#84118" target="_blank"&gt;Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes&lt;/A&gt;: Snapshot '2012-06-14_0941+0200_daily' not found in volume 'vol_W_FN_bexec'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24352#M5201</guid>
      <dc:creator>mauro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T13:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24358#M5204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the culprit here is snaplock. Protection Manger does not support snapvault of volumes which are snaplock enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this happening in other volumes which are dedupe enabled but not snaplocked as well ? Then we will have to dig deeper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24358#M5204</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T13:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24362#M5205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;All volumes are snaplocked in this filer…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This problem happens on all snapvault relationships&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24362#M5205</guid>
      <dc:creator>mauro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T13:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24367#M5207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snapvault of snap locked enabled volumes are not supported in Protection Manager. You are trying to run a unsupported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24367#M5207</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T13:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed to create secondary snapshot , Reason : Could not get creation time on snaplock volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24372#M5208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW I strongly recommend you to use OC 5.0.1 as it a GA candidate of OC 5.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: Though this does not solve your problem of snaplock being unsupported. Also my initial hunch of filer overloaded is not the cause here as its more a snaplock and dedupe combination than load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Failed-to-create-secondary-snapshot-Reason-Could-not-get-creation-time-on/m-p/24372#M5208</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T13:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

