<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ProtMgr 3.8 to ProtMgr 4.0 upgrade in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26542#M5548</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With PM4.0 there is now the option to DR... if I'm currently protected under 3.8 and I upgrade to 4.0; then change my protection policy to 'DR Mirror and Backup,&amp;nbsp; what will happen????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Current 3.8 protection policy = 'Mirror &amp;amp; Backup' (for argument sake, all data has been baselined and only deltas are replicating)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Upgrade to OM4.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Modify datasets to point to use new protection policy, 'DR Mirror &amp;amp; Backup'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Can the PM 3.8 'Mirror' be converted into PM 4.0 'DR mirror' or will i need to rebaseline? in DOT, you can convet a VSM to a 'vfiler dr', will OM do the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) The DFM help file specifically states that the PM 'DR' functionality is not the same as a DOT 'vfiler DR'...if this is the case, what is the process/workflow in the event of a site failrue and cutover? what's the differences between the OM and DOT cutover?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sswain123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:17:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ProtMgr 3.8 to ProtMgr 4.0 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26542#M5548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With PM4.0 there is now the option to DR... if I'm currently protected under 3.8 and I upgrade to 4.0; then change my protection policy to 'DR Mirror and Backup,&amp;nbsp; what will happen????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Current 3.8 protection policy = 'Mirror &amp;amp; Backup' (for argument sake, all data has been baselined and only deltas are replicating)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Upgrade to OM4.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Modify datasets to point to use new protection policy, 'DR Mirror &amp;amp; Backup'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Can the PM 3.8 'Mirror' be converted into PM 4.0 'DR mirror' or will i need to rebaseline? in DOT, you can convet a VSM to a 'vfiler dr', will OM do the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) The DFM help file specifically states that the PM 'DR' functionality is not the same as a DOT 'vfiler DR'...if this is the case, what is the process/workflow in the event of a site failrue and cutover? what's the differences between the OM and DOT cutover?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26542#M5548</guid>
      <dc:creator>sswain123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ProtMgr 3.8 to ProtMgr 4.0 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26547#M5550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you apply a DR-enabled policy to a dataset, two things happen.&amp;nbsp; First, we know the dataset is DR-enabled, so we allow some extra configuration options on the DR node (to set up data exports, just like you can on the primary node).&amp;nbsp; Second, we compute a DR readiness status and make that front and center.&amp;nbsp; This rolls up all the information we can find to predict whether a failover would work.&amp;nbsp; Basically this says all the primary data is being replicated, it's within it's lag threshold, and all the secondary systems are in fact up and running.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the storage system you won't see any different. It's still just a bunch of volumes with SnapMirror relationships.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Yes, you can replace a "Mirror and Backup" policy with "DR Mirror and Backup" policy without a rebaseline.&amp;nbsp; Both Mirror and DR Mirror connections get implemented with volume SnapMirror.&amp;nbsp; You can always just try it and see: edit the dataset, look at the preview results, then cancel the edit wizard.&amp;nbsp; There's never any harm in doing that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; With ProtMgr DR, you don't have to use vfilers on both sides (you can if you wish, but it's not required).&amp;nbsp; When you want to fail over, there's a "Failover" button on the DR screen.&amp;nbsp; Push that.&amp;nbsp; ProtMgr will break all the mirrors and ensure your data is exported on the DR side.&amp;nbsp; By "exported", I mean we'll create NFS and/or CIFS shares on the destination that match the source for NAS data, and we'll create igroups and map LUNs for SAN data.&amp;nbsp; You have the flexibility to export the DR data to the same hosts you used to access the primary data, or to a different set of host if you plan on using different hosts after a disaster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- Pete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:53:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26547#M5550</guid>
      <dc:creator>smoot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T16:53:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ProtMgr 3.8 to ProtMgr 4.0 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26552#M5552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oh, I forgot to add.&amp;nbsp; Dataset-based DR has been available since 3.7, it's not new for 4.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- Pete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/ProtMgr-3-8-to-ProtMgr-4-0-upgrade/m-p/26552#M5552</guid>
      <dc:creator>smoot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T16:54:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

