<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30791#M6332</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;While you cannot subtract from a raidgroup you can modify the maximum size and add. It will warn you if certain raidsizes are not supported in earlier ontap releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This gives the current raidsize setting:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol options &amp;lt;volname&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This modifies the raidsize:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol options &amp;lt;volname&amp;gt; raidsize &amp;lt;setting&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd imagine its much easier using your gui of choice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general I prefer to decide on what my ideal raidsize is when I initially create the aggregate. Diverging from this setting shouldn't have any affect if one rg is 1-2 disks larger than the other and you are topping out its maximum size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I usually think about it as trade off between rebuild times and performance or max usable capacity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this for a more in depth discussion:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/23622" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/23622&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dougsiggins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-15T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30774#M6327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for direction on adding 2 new DS4243 shelves into our existing FAS2040 environment. Focusing on properly distributing the addition of the 48 new disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS2040HA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP 7.3.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internal disks are 12x450GB SAS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 DS4243 Shelves, 24x450GB SAS and 24x1TB SATA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Controller A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: normal; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: normal;"&gt;Aggr0 - RAID Size 24 - SAS, Total 2.87TB, 10 disks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: normal; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: normal;"&gt;Aggr1 - RAID Size 14 - SATA, Total 7.27TB, 12 disks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: normal; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: normal;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: normal; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: normal;"&gt;Controller B&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: normal; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: normal;"&gt;Aggr0 - RAID Size 28 - SAS, Total 8.61TB, 26 disks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;Aggr1 - RAID Size 14 - SATA, Total 6.22TB, 11 disks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;1 spare SATA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;I'm not fully understanding the RAID size aspect of the aggregates, but I do know the aggregate maximum size is 16TB (Is that RAW size or not?)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;If I understand things I've read, the larger the RAID size to better the performance is because the data is striped across more disks but if a disk fails then rebuilding will take much longer.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;Is there any kind of charts for layout of disks based on the disk size?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30774#M6327</guid>
      <dc:creator>cgeck0000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30779#M6328</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this string, it goes into great detail the exact thoughts you are having:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/thread/1587" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/thread/1587&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16T is *not* raw &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** corrected see below ***&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30779#M6328</guid>
      <dc:creator>dougsiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-14T17:13:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30783#M6329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16TB limit is not raw, it is usable, so e.g. the maximum spindle count for 1TB drives is 23 for ONTAP 7.3.4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bigger RAID groups are not necessarily better for performance (an aggregate can span multiple RGs, so can a volume), but there is less capacity overhead (fewer parity drives).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am suggesting reading up this doc:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Storage Subsystem Technical FAQ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=7178&amp;amp;docid=9866" target="_blank"&gt;https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=7178&amp;amp;docid=9866&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30783#M6329</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-14T20:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30787#M6330</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for all the documentation to read, TR and community posts.&amp;nbsp; I will soak them in during the next couple of days.&amp;nbsp; A quick question though, can the RAID group size be changed on an aggregate without data lost?&amp;nbsp; If so, what is the proper way of doing so and what are the negatives of making such change.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30787#M6330</guid>
      <dc:creator>cgeck0000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-15T15:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30791#M6332</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;While you cannot subtract from a raidgroup you can modify the maximum size and add. It will warn you if certain raidsizes are not supported in earlier ontap releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This gives the current raidsize setting:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol options &amp;lt;volname&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This modifies the raidsize:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol options &amp;lt;volname&amp;gt; raidsize &amp;lt;setting&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd imagine its much easier using your gui of choice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general I prefer to decide on what my ideal raidsize is when I initially create the aggregate. Diverging from this setting shouldn't have any affect if one rg is 1-2 disks larger than the other and you are topping out its maximum size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I usually think about it as trade off between rebuild times and performance or max usable capacity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this for a more in depth discussion:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/23622" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/23622&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30791#M6332</guid>
      <dc:creator>dougsiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-15T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guidence With Adding 2 Additional DS4243 Shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30796#M6335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing raid group size won't affect existing raid groups unless you also add disks to aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Guidence-With-Adding-2-Additional-DS4243-Shelves/m-p/30796#M6335</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-15T17:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

