<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31378#M6476</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jean-Christophe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes but the bug # for the same is 711018.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T06:58:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31350#M6463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was using a policy "Remote Backup"only to do backup of OSSV clients, but then I wanted to add a mirror to a DR site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed the solution proposed in a discussion to modify the policy "Backup then Mirror" to remove the Primary Backup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've applied the new Protection Policy to the backup, but the Conformance fails as PM only provisions a volume of 10 GB on the mirror.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The relationship creation fails because the destination doesn't meet the required size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did I miss something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31350#M6463</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcbettinelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31354#M6465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Hi Jean-Christophe&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Couple of questions before I can give you some solutions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Are you running OCUM 5.1 ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Is the option dpDynamicSecondarySizing turned on/enabled ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;"&gt;Do you have Other relationship like SV/QSM or VSM in your Environment ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;"&gt;adai&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:45:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31354#M6465</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T09:45:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31359#M6467</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for helping on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- It is OCUM 5.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- dpDynamicSecondarySizing is turned on:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[root@oncommand ~]# dfm options list | grep dpDynamicSecondarySizing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dpDynamicSecondarySizing&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Yes, I already use other SV/QSM or VCM relations. I use always "Back then Mirror" for CIFS, SnapManager for Exchange, etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jean-Christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31359#M6467</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcbettinelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T10:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31364#M6469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Adai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I have to change the option dpDynamicSecondarySizing or should I update one value in the options?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jean-Christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31364#M6469</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcbettinelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-07T14:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31369#M6471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jean-Christophe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The reason is in case of dynamic Secondary sizing it looks like we are using the projected size(the value of the options &lt;STRONG style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;pmOSSVDirSecondaryVolSizeMb&lt;/STRONG&gt;) and not the actual size of thesnapvault destination&amp;nbsp; volume for Volume SnapMirror Destination volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For OSSV destination volume we always create aggr size volume if we have free space as per the value of the option &lt;STRONG style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;pmOSSVDirSecondaryVolSizeMb&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you set the value of this options to the size of the secondary volume created for OSSV destination volume ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW I have created&amp;nbsp; bug711018 for the same can you create a case and add to it ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31369#M6471</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-17T10:54:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31373#M6473</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Adai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have opened case 2004149517 regarding this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dror, the escalation engineer has replied:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;As we saw, we are hitting bug 677951 which causes DSS to provision Volume SnapMirror volumes in a wrong size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This bug does not yet have a fix, you can read some more about it here - &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-message-small" data-containerid="2026" data-containertype="14" data-objectid="105168" data-objecttype="2" href="https://communities.netapp.com/message/105168#105168" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/message/105168#105168&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While we work on a fix in next version, we have tried implementing a workaround to get backups working in your environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have created the VSM volume manually from Data OnTap, and then told Protection Manager to use the volume we created for the backup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what we have here is a bug in OnCommand 5.1 that is causing OSSV Mirror part to choose wrong size for the destination, which later on fails as the volume was created too small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I did to workaround is to create the SnapMirror destination volume manually, with 16tb (space reservation is off so only occupied space will really be allocated).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I changed the resource pool config in the mirror node of the backup (on the dataset edit window) to the physical volume that I created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I conform the Dataset so it will create the Volume SnapMirror relationship.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For now the issue has been solved for the customer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does your bug # also link to the same problem ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jean-Christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31373#M6473</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcbettinelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-21T08:33:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using an OSSV PM policy to mirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31378#M6476</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jean-Christophe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes but the bug # for the same is 711018.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Using-an-OSSV-PM-policy-to-mirror/m-p/31378#M6476</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-24T06:58:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

