<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DFM and 64bit Windows in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DFM-and-64bit-Windows/m-p/31737#M6562</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;64-bit platforms benefit applications in two ways,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Faster computations for values larger than 32-bit &lt;BR /&gt;2. Larger address space for the processes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First advantage is not very prominent in case of DFM because DFM is not computation intensive. &lt;BR /&gt;However, larger address space will benefit many DFM services e.g. server, monitor, eventd, and SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Santosh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ssantosh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-17T18:17:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DFM and 64bit Windows</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DFM-and-64bit-Windows/m-p/31734#M6561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any views or evdience as to what the performance/benefits would be to host DFM on a x64 bit paltform over a x32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or does Sybase ASA constrain any performance advantages ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DFM-and-64bit-Windows/m-p/31734#M6561</guid>
      <dc:creator>fenton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DFM and 64bit Windows</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DFM-and-64bit-Windows/m-p/31737#M6562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;64-bit platforms benefit applications in two ways,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Faster computations for values larger than 32-bit &lt;BR /&gt;2. Larger address space for the processes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First advantage is not very prominent in case of DFM because DFM is not computation intensive. &lt;BR /&gt;However, larger address space will benefit many DFM services e.g. server, monitor, eventd, and SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Santosh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DFM-and-64bit-Windows/m-p/31737#M6562</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssantosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T18:17:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

