<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Object exclusion list in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33747#M6960</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Geoff,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did not understand your requirement. can you please elaborate a bit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>girirp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-10T09:38:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Object exclusion list</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33742#M6958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer would like to be able to exclude objects from automation activities.&amp;nbsp; So, for example, a qtree, a volume, a dataset, an aggregate.&amp;nbsp; If this object is on the list, then it will be excluded from any automation activities.&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking that the best way to do this will be to use the 2.0 playground table.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Geoff Kleemola&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33742#M6958</guid>
      <dc:creator>kleemola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object exclusion list</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33747#M6960</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Geoff,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did not understand your requirement. can you please elaborate a bit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33747#M6960</guid>
      <dc:creator>girirp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-10T09:38:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object exclusion list</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33752#M6962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a couple of ways to accomplish this.&amp;nbsp; Yes, the 2.0 playground database would be a way to manage these types of entries and allow you to build a filter/finder that can prevent certain actions.&amp;nbsp; Another way that this can be done today, is to leverage DFM Resource Groups.&amp;nbsp; This other option would allow you to easily add/remove entries and as well provide some granularity to how these types of actions are applied.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have used the second option several times to limit WFA from being able to provision or manage objects that might be dedicated to a different customer or project.&amp;nbsp; Another option that I have found useful in a current project is to label aggregates that WFA is allowed to use.&amp;nbsp; For example, this project has dedicated storage and the provisioning workflows can look into any datacenter and find the associated aggregates based on a naming convention.&amp;nbsp; This will limit where WFA actually places the new volumes/qtrees/exports to only be in these specific aggregates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The nice thing about using Resource Groups in DFM is that you would also be able to use WFA to add/remove objects automatically via a workflow.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Jeremy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33752#M6962</guid>
      <dc:creator>goodrum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-10T11:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object exclusion list</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33761#M6965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jeremy.&amp;nbsp; Those are some really good ideas!&amp;nbsp; I think the Resource Group might be the perfect solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Object-exclusion-list/m-p/33761#M6965</guid>
      <dc:creator>kleemola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-10T13:11:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

