<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: volume nearly over deduplicated in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36074#M7379</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Maico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only problem is, if the volume is over deduplicated, and if you wish to un-dedupe the volume would not be able to hold the data.Thats the only downsized I know of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-03T13:05:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>volume nearly over deduplicated</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36069#M7376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i received an alert that one of my volume is nearly over deduplicated. i can edit the threshold but i am curiious.&amp;nbsp; I have read that this is a good thing?But is there any drawback to it at all? Meaning a volume getting over deduplicaated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maico&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36069#M7376</guid>
      <dc:creator>mdvillanueva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: volume nearly over deduplicated</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36074#M7379</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Maico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only problem is, if the volume is over deduplicated, and if you wish to un-dedupe the volume would not be able to hold the data.Thats the only downsized I know of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36074#M7379</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-03T13:05:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>volume nearly over deduplicated</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36080#M7382</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36080#M7382</guid>
      <dc:creator>mdvillanueva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T00:16:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: volume nearly over deduplicated</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36085#M7383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, in essence, as long as you can reclaim enough space in the aggregate by reducing the other flex volumes, to allow for the "used" + "saved", you could deduplicate the volume if necessary?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have increased the dfm thresholds by 10% each from original installation settings already, and will probably do another 5-10% increase, but I'm trying to understand the correletion between 50% saved and 150% deduplicated as shown below? ( it appears the event was triggered during the last pass of sis )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KLNAS1-1&amp;gt; sis status /vol/KW_N1_F1_A1_V7_JDE1_R&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Path&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; State&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Status&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Progress&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/vol/KW_N1_F1_A1_V7_JDE1_R&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Enabled&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Idle&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Idle for 14:24:10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KLNAS1-1&amp;gt; df -hs /vol/KW_N1_F1_A1_V7_JDE1_R&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Filesystem&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; used&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; saved&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; %saved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/vol/KW_N1_F1_A1_V7_JDE1_R/&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 597GB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 587GB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 50%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/16010_dedupe_event.jpg" style="width: 825px; height: 227.33333333333331px;" width="825" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36085#M7383</guid>
      <dc:creator>RBLT_GLOBAL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T22:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: volume nearly over deduplicated</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36090#M7385</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it as simple as the following?&amp;nbsp; ( in a case where df - s reports 50% savings on 1000GB data )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;df -s shows deduped savings as a percentage of undeduped data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ( 500 used, 1000 data, therefore 500saved/1000 = 50% ), while&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dfm option OverDeduplicatedThreshold is calculated by undeduped data as a percentage of deduped space usage&amp;nbsp; ( 1000undeduped / 500 used = 200% )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just hoping to confirm/clarify.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/volume-nearly-over-deduplicated/m-p/36090#M7385</guid>
      <dc:creator>RBLT_GLOBAL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T22:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

