<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - &amp;quot;Volume does not exist&amp;quot; in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36128#M7398</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It took three attempts, but the "remove policy" finally worked.&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure why it took so many attempts, but for the moment it has cleared.&amp;nbsp; It was one specific LUN that this blade was using, that isn't being accessed by the others, hence no violation on the other 9 blades.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for walking me through this!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-14T19:03:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36093#M7387</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After confirming with our storage team, it looks like OCI is giving a false path outage. I'd like to clear the violation, but I'm hitting a road block somewhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Violation, OCI is picking up an incomplete volume name, which does not exist, and reporting a path outage.&amp;nbsp; OCI does see the correct volume name, so I'm not sure where this incomplete volume, that apparently doesn't exist, is coming from. Does this sound familiar to anyone?&amp;nbsp; Or is there a way around it?&amp;nbsp; I've tried changing the path/host policies to see if I can override the violation somehow, but it won't budge.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts on where this violation is coming from and how to clear it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:30:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36093#M7387</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:30:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36096#M7388</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The violation should go away when you dismiss it, and generally should stay gone.&amp;nbsp; You would see a Path Outage if a volume by that name used to exist and has since been removed.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it comes back after being dismissed, it might be worth considering whether there is some process automatically creating and destroying the volume in the background.&amp;nbsp; Sites that mount SYM snapshot volumes to TSM servers for backups will see path outages on the temporary snapshot volumes each time they are deleted, for instance.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look at the list of volumes for the storage array in question, and make sure that they correspond to actual volumes on the storage array.&amp;nbsp; If there's a pattern of volumes coming across with wrong names, you would have a data source issue.&amp;nbsp; This is unlikely.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36096#M7388</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T16:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36105#M7389</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried clearing it, but it keeps coming back.&amp;nbsp; This is originating from a UCS cluster, and we just recently were able to add the associated NPV chassis switches to help with our view.&amp;nbsp; We still have a couple of NPV switches that we are trying to identify at the moment, and perhaps once we get those ID'd in OCI, it may clear it.&amp;nbsp; This is the only blade reporting a violation in the cluster (10 total), so it's curious.&amp;nbsp; Specifically, it's a volume on a NetApp 7-Mode array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the Volumes view, the volumes that OCI reports are the actual volumes on the storage arrays, and the names are correct; we don't see the "non-existent" volume in the Volumes view. It's only with this violation where we see this non-existent volume name.&amp;nbsp; There hasn't been a pattern of this on any other server/cluster, but this is also a relatively new cluster.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll need to ask the storage team about temporary snapshot volumes, if they happen to have similar volume names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36105#M7389</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T16:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36110#M7391</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What events show up as triggering the violation?&amp;nbsp; Take a look at the history.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36110#M7391</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T16:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36114#M7393</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is considered a "Path Outage", port connectivity was changed.&amp;nbsp; What is throwing me off is that the violation view is reporting a volume that doesn't seem to exist.&amp;nbsp; Or more specifically, the name of the volume is off by one letter from the correct volume name.&amp;nbsp; It's missing one letter in the name.&amp;nbsp; But this incorrect volume name is only seen in the Violation view (right click&amp;gt;Analyze Violation).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to find out from our storage team if there are temporary volumes that might get a similar but slightly modified name...this is the first time I've seen a violation with a "volume does not exist".&amp;nbsp; Then again, we haven't identified all of the fiber interconnects for the NPV switches, and that might be impacting our acquisition, too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:58:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36114#M7393</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T16:58:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36119#M7395</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Julia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#1. When you analyze the violation, the first tab in the resulting window has a filtered Changes view - if someone renamed the volume, OCI is likely to perceive it as a volume deletion / volume creation at the same time period, as OCI has no way of knowing that "lunX" was "lunV" previously - OCI only sees that lunV is gone, and lunX now exists - in this scenario, OCI throws a path outage violation for lunX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#2. OCI might keep generating the violation because someone configured a path policy for this particular path - so long as the individual path policy exists, OCI has the expectation that the volume should exist.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under Assurance -&amp;gt; SAN Path Policies - see if there are any path policies for the host + volume in question. You can right click -&amp;gt; Remove Policy in this view&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36119#M7395</guid>
      <dc:creator>ostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T17:05:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we clear a Path Outage Violation - "Volume does not exist"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36128#M7398</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It took three attempts, but the "remove policy" finally worked.&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure why it took so many attempts, but for the moment it has cleared.&amp;nbsp; It was one specific LUN that this blade was using, that isn't being accessed by the others, hence no violation on the other 9 blades.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for walking me through this!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-can-we-clear-a-Path-Outage-Violation-quot-Volume-does-not-exist-quot/m-p/36128#M7398</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T19:03:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

