<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Customer Performance Database is huge in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36260#M7417</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;During an upgrade today, the warning came out that said the upgrade can take hours with a larger database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;curiousity is&amp;nbsp; ... what defines a larger database.&amp;nbsp; Ours is 4.7GB in size, our performance directory is a total of 77 GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-20T22:25:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36256#M7415</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to purge or trim DFM databases?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is taking over three hours to back up and it is 77GB in size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36256#M7415</guid>
      <dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:14:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36260#M7417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;During an upgrade today, the warning came out that said the upgrade can take hours with a larger database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;curiousity is&amp;nbsp; ... what defines a larger database.&amp;nbsp; Ours is 4.7GB in size, our performance directory is a total of 77 GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36260#M7417</guid>
      <dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-20T22:25:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36264#M7419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think what you're asking for is to reduce the size of the performance advisor data. I do not know how to do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't worry about the database file itself (the 4.7 GB one). Almost certainly most of the three hours is spent with the PA files. But if you want to try it, use "dfm database reload". This will also take a substantial amount of time because it dumps the entire database contents into a text file, then reloads it. I don't know how fast the DFM server is but I'd plan on a few hours rather than a few minutes. You could restore a DFM backup on a test system to try it out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- Pete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36264#M7419</guid>
      <dc:creator>smoot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-20T22:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36269#M7422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thats the command; i remember hearing about it for Juniper's OM/PM work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is our upgrade stats:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16 GB RAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dual Xeons; Red Hat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;26 minutes to upgrade from 3.7.x to 3.8.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also here is something curious that happened on the file system for the DFM host; the monitor.dbR and .logR files were removed.&amp;nbsp; What are these?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;before:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{506}$ ls –l /dfm/data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;total 8883848&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw------- 1 root bin 5002133504 May 20 15:19 monitordb.db&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw------- 1 root bin 4046815232 May 20 15:23 monitordb.dbR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw------- 1 root bin&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 38862848 May 20 15:18 monitordb.log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw-r--r-- 1 root bin&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 327680 May 20 15:23 monitordb.logR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{507}$ du -sh *&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.7G&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; monitordb.db&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.8G&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; monitordb.dbR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;38M&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; monitordb.log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;328K&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; monitordb.logR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{508}$&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{552}$ pwd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/dfm/data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{553}$ ls -l&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;total 4830092&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw------- 1 root bin 4926939136 May 20 15:53 monitordb.db&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw------- 1 root bin&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14221312 May 20 15:53 monitordb.log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;qct-dfm-sdc{554}$&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36269#M7422</guid>
      <dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-20T22:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36273#M7424</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reloading happens in 3 steps according to sybase interfaces:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Create a new database with the same settings as the old database&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Reload it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Replace the old database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the new database is created in step 1, the dbspace file names have an R&amp;nbsp; appended to the file name to prevent file name conflicts if the dbspace file for the new database is created in the same&amp;nbsp; directory as the dbspace for the original database. Thats why you are seeing monitordb.dbR and monitordb.logR files. These will be replaced with monitordb.db and monitordb.log files accordingly in step 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sanjyoth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36273#M7424</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjyoth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-21T04:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36278#M7427</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;okay ... works for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as form putting the DB on a diet .. we will hold off since the update on DFM software only took 26 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now ... would the command help reduce the footprint on the collected performance data?&amp;nbsp; At some point it is going to overrun the available storage parition it is in ... what is the best way to mitigate this issue?&amp;nbsp; example:&amp;nbsp; if i have two years of perf data can i shave off the last year?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:30:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36278#M7427</guid>
      <dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-21T18:30:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36283#M7430</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is very nicely handled in Operations Manager 4.0/Performance Advisor/NetApp Management Console 3.0 (may be in earlier versions but I'm not sure).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Login to the NetApp Management Console --&amp;gt; Performance Advisor --&amp;gt; "Set Up" button --&amp;gt; Hosts --&amp;gt; click on the Host --&amp;gt; choose "Data Collection" tab. That shows you each counter, the retention period, the current used space, projected space, etc. You can then adjust the retention periods for any of the counters (or just stop gathering certain counters)....quite nicely done overall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 03:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36283#M7430</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-22T03:13:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Customer Performance Database is huge</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36288#M7432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ask your customer if they truly need to keep 2 years worth of performance data on-line within Performance Advisor.&amp;nbsp; If not, consider exporting the historical performance data to CSV flat-files, and only keeping 3-6 months worth of performance data on the PA server.&amp;nbsp; You can also configure DFM to auto-export performance data automatically on a schedule. This would allow you to keep performance data historically for years without clogging-up your perfdata folder.&amp;nbsp; It would also make your DFM database backups much smaller and faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial; color: black; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://communities.netapp.com/docs/DOC-1218" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/docs/DOC-1218&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Customer-Performance-Database-is-huge/m-p/36288#M7432</guid>
      <dc:creator>reide</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-03T03:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

