<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CX4 Datasource performance issue in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39724#M8167</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue with the Flare 29 is nothing to do with the cannot parse host file, if I remove the&amp;nbsp; array performance check on the data source everything completes fine for the serivce insight, however if I enable the array performance and start a data logging on the clariion application insight fails with Internal Error: General message.&amp;nbsp; Now the other discusions have to do with not getting the getall hba command to complete, well that is fine if that is happening but on the sanscreen box I get all the navicli commands to complete fine and again if I remove performance it works fine.&amp;nbsp; This is something to do with the flare 29 performance captures and their format not matching what sanscreen is expecting.&amp;nbsp; Is anything going to be done or are you waiting for Flare 30 and unisphere before putting engery behind the format changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>batchtom2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:11:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CX4 Datasource performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39724#M8167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue with the Flare 29 is nothing to do with the cannot parse host file, if I remove the&amp;nbsp; array performance check on the data source everything completes fine for the serivce insight, however if I enable the array performance and start a data logging on the clariion application insight fails with Internal Error: General message.&amp;nbsp; Now the other discusions have to do with not getting the getall hba command to complete, well that is fine if that is happening but on the sanscreen box I get all the navicli commands to complete fine and again if I remove performance it works fine.&amp;nbsp; This is something to do with the flare 29 performance captures and their format not matching what sanscreen is expecting.&amp;nbsp; Is anything going to be done or are you waiting for Flare 30 and unisphere before putting engery behind the format changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39724#M8167</guid>
      <dc:creator>batchtom2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CX4 Datasource performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39729#M8168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We do have customers doing AI:Array Perf on CX4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first thing I'd check - what version is the naviseccli.exe on the SANscreen server? The analyzer stuff is &lt;STRONG&gt;much&lt;/STRONG&gt; more version sensitive than the inventory getall commands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen 28 navisec fail against a 29 FLARE CX4 because the cli couldn't understand the 29 archive format&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39729#M8168</guid>
      <dc:creator>ostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-03T15:12:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CX4 Datasource performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39737#M8169</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;True We are using naviseccli 6.28.20.1.40 checking for a later version to see if that helps anything. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39737#M8169</guid>
      <dc:creator>batchtom2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-03T15:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CX4 Datasource performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39741#M8170</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Winner winner chicken dinner, it was the navisec not matching the flare, it is now completing the application insight capture of the system stats.&amp;nbsp; Now I can get true end to end testing for sanscreen.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&amp;nbsp; The other error is if a user sees missing initiators in the clariion itself. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:46:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CX4-Datasource-performance-issue/m-p/39741#M8170</guid>
      <dc:creator>batchtom2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-03T15:46:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

