<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ZAPI - Storeage-disk-get-iter - storage-ssd-info in Software Development Kit (SDK) and API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/ZAPI-Storeage-disk-get-iter-storage-ssd-info/m-p/120666#M1985</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you can help me in this case...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Partner got a question, for which I couldn’t find any usable information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTap API (v 1.31 cluster):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="00.png" style="width: 407px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5546iD94D019275C37023/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="00.png" alt="00.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;storage-ssd-info &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="01.png" style="width: 373px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5547iC8034A44566D6F56/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="01.png" alt="01.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;And&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="02.png" style="width: 375px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5548iA011FC1FE80C180E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="02.png" alt="02.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To the partner, these two values would be sort of in sync, as the lifetime of a ssd would also be related to the number of spares available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So he &amp;nbsp;had a look at it’s AFF systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="03.png" style="width: 957px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5549i96B50F6266FBDC02/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="03.png" alt="03.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and see the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="004.png" style="width: 669px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5550i0CA15A783C901B2F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="004.png" alt="004.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a snippet. Some have higher spares used. But what the partner find it weird the wear percent . which is 0, but the spares used percent is 7 or more (on others) percent. Is this expected? Which number is leading? It seems also strange that the SSDs seem to use the spares at a consistent rate, as in, consistent usage across all the SSDs. &amp;nbsp;Is this also expected behavior?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestion is welcome!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farhang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Farhang_Malek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T20:12:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ZAPI - Storeage-disk-get-iter - storage-ssd-info</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/ZAPI-Storeage-disk-get-iter-storage-ssd-info/m-p/120666#M1985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you can help me in this case...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Partner got a question, for which I couldn’t find any usable information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTap API (v 1.31 cluster):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="00.png" style="width: 407px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5546iD94D019275C37023/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="00.png" alt="00.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;storage-ssd-info &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="01.png" style="width: 373px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5547iC8034A44566D6F56/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="01.png" alt="01.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;And&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="02.png" style="width: 375px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5548iA011FC1FE80C180E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="02.png" alt="02.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To the partner, these two values would be sort of in sync, as the lifetime of a ssd would also be related to the number of spares available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So he &amp;nbsp;had a look at it’s AFF systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="03.png" style="width: 957px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5549i96B50F6266FBDC02/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="03.png" alt="03.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and see the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="004.png" style="width: 669px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5550i0CA15A783C901B2F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="004.png" alt="004.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a snippet. Some have higher spares used. But what the partner find it weird the wear percent . which is 0, but the spares used percent is 7 or more (on others) percent. Is this expected? Which number is leading? It seems also strange that the SSDs seem to use the spares at a consistent rate, as in, consistent usage across all the SSDs. &amp;nbsp;Is this also expected behavior?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestion is welcome!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farhang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/ZAPI-Storeage-disk-get-iter-storage-ssd-info/m-p/120666#M1985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farhang_Malek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T20:12:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ZAPI - Storeage-disk-get-iter - storage-ssd-info</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/ZAPI-Storeage-disk-get-iter-storage-ssd-info/m-p/120677#M1988</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;percent-rated-life-used represents how much of the life span of the drive, as estimated by the manufacturer, has passed. &amp;nbsp;For example, if MTBF for the drive is 2 million power on hours, but only 100,000 hours have passed it would show as 5%. &amp;nbsp;This is independent&amp;nbsp;of the number of spare blocks used/free.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also note that percent-rated-life-used can be greater than 100. &amp;nbsp;It is based on the estimated lifespan of the drive from the manufacturer...if the drive lives longer than the estimate&amp;nbsp;it would have a value &amp;gt; 100, but that is not a predictor/indicator of failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;percent-rated-life-used&amp;nbsp;is a purely informational field, whereas percent-spares-used is important&amp;nbsp;monitoring information since running out of spare blocks would cause the disk to be failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/ZAPI-Storeage-disk-get-iter-storage-ssd-info/m-p/120677#M1988</guid>
      <dc:creator>asulliva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-28T13:28:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

