<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Total Processor Busy Overflows  SDK 4.1 in Software Development Kit (SDK) and API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36078#M325</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using the SDK&amp;nbsp; with Perl I have noticed that the value obtained for&amp;nbsp; the total processor busy is often much larger than 100 goes up to 200 + sometimes for high utilized filers. For filers that are lightly utilized it does not overflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else observed this ? Is there a possible solution or do we have to wait on an SDK update ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;% CPU utilization = (total_processor_busy at time t2 - total_processor_busy at time t1) /(cpu_elapsed_time at time t2 - cpu_elapsed_time at time t1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DWAYNECAMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:15:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Total Processor Busy Overflows  SDK 4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36078#M325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using the SDK&amp;nbsp; with Perl I have noticed that the value obtained for&amp;nbsp; the total processor busy is often much larger than 100 goes up to 200 + sometimes for high utilized filers. For filers that are lightly utilized it does not overflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else observed this ? Is there a possible solution or do we have to wait on an SDK update ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;% CPU utilization = (total_processor_busy at time t2 - total_processor_busy at time t1) /(cpu_elapsed_time at time t2 - cpu_elapsed_time at time t1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36078#M325</guid>
      <dc:creator>DWAYNECAMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:15:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Total Processor Busy Overflows  SDK 4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36083#M326</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So NMSDK has 3 performance metrics related to the processor:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;cpu_busy ( sysstat -x like&amp;nbsp; utilization for processor performance)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;avg_processor_busy ( average utilization across all cores )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;total_processor_busy (utilization across all cores, example if 2 processors are present and are both at 100%. total processor busy will show 200%)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore it does not overflow. For general sysstat like cpu performance metric "cpu_busy") should be used and not total_processor_busy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36083#M326</guid>
      <dc:creator>DWAYNECAMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-14T19:14:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Total Processor Busy Overflows  SDK 4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36088#M327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, this would help others as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Total-Processor-Busy-Overflows-SDK-4-1/m-p/36088#M327</guid>
      <dc:creator>aashray</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-15T05:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

