<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers? in Software Development Kit (SDK) and API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51853#M445</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sfo-connection-state element in an ic-get-error-stats is documented in the 1.15 API (haven't looked at others) as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR bgcolor="#E8E8E8"&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: verdana; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Connection state with peer. Possible value: "not connected", "waiting for connected", "waiting for not connected", "connected", "waiting for teardown", "unknown"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;...which is correct on older models, for example a healthy 3170A running 8.0.2P5D6 reports:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;connected&amp;lt;/sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, on 3270's (8.0.1P5) and 62x0's (running 8.1D4) invented a new value, "Established":&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;Established&amp;lt;/sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While this is easy enough to accommodate for (despite the inconsistent use of capitalization relative to the rest of the API), the bigger concern is what other states should I expect? Is there an open BURT to attach a case to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kevingraham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51853#M445</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sfo-connection-state element in an ic-get-error-stats is documented in the 1.15 API (haven't looked at others) as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR bgcolor="#E8E8E8"&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: verdana; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Connection state with peer. Possible value: "not connected", "waiting for connected", "waiting for not connected", "connected", "waiting for teardown", "unknown"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;...which is correct on older models, for example a healthy 3170A running 8.0.2P5D6 reports:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;connected&amp;lt;/sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, on 3270's (8.0.1P5) and 62x0's (running 8.1D4) invented a new value, "Established":&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;Established&amp;lt;/sfo-connection-state&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While this is easy enough to accommodate for (despite the inconsistent use of capitalization relative to the rest of the API), the bigger concern is what other states should I expect? Is there an open BURT to attach a case to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51853#M445</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevingraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51858#M446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A burt has been open for the reported issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Kunal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51858#M446</guid>
      <dc:creator>kunalm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-12T08:48:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51863#M447</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This issue also seen with ONATPI version 1.13.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Amir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51863#M447</guid>
      <dc:creator>amirm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-12T11:16:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51868#M448</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Awesome, thanks. Do you have the BURT id?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51868#M448</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevingraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-14T15:47:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken ic-get-error-stats on new controllers?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51872#M449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kevin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have filed the bug with BURT#620223 on 7/12. Will keep you posted with the updates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Amir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:00:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Software-Development-Kit-SDK-and-API-Discussions/Broken-ic-get-error-stats-on-new-controllers/m-p/51872#M449</guid>
      <dc:creator>amirm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-17T17:00:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

