<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ESXi and Netapp Volume size questions... in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12361#M1271</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently setting up a ESXi 4.1 integration to a Netapp 2040 via iscsi.&amp;nbsp; The netapp has two shelves/arrays.&amp;nbsp; First is 24 - 300GB 15k SAS disks.&amp;nbsp; Second is 12 - 1TB SATA disks.&amp;nbsp; I am using RAID DP which puts me at roughly (very roughly) 5TB of useable space on each array.&amp;nbsp; I have roughly 50 virtual machines which take up about 4 TB of space.&amp;nbsp; 2 TB of that are VMs with our our main file server on it.&amp;nbsp; The other two TB is a VM with our archive file server on it.&amp;nbsp; Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How big should I make the aggregates/volumes on the Netapp size?.&amp;nbsp; I was thinking about just creating One 5TB Volume on the first array.&amp;nbsp; Then creating another 5TB volume on the other array, and then just dump all my VM's in there.&amp;nbsp; Simple but I have read that it may not be the best performance wise.&amp;nbsp; Anyone have any best practices on how I should carve this data up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>csgranite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:56:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESXi and Netapp Volume size questions...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12361#M1271</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently setting up a ESXi 4.1 integration to a Netapp 2040 via iscsi.&amp;nbsp; The netapp has two shelves/arrays.&amp;nbsp; First is 24 - 300GB 15k SAS disks.&amp;nbsp; Second is 12 - 1TB SATA disks.&amp;nbsp; I am using RAID DP which puts me at roughly (very roughly) 5TB of useable space on each array.&amp;nbsp; I have roughly 50 virtual machines which take up about 4 TB of space.&amp;nbsp; 2 TB of that are VMs with our our main file server on it.&amp;nbsp; The other two TB is a VM with our archive file server on it.&amp;nbsp; Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How big should I make the aggregates/volumes on the Netapp size?.&amp;nbsp; I was thinking about just creating One 5TB Volume on the first array.&amp;nbsp; Then creating another 5TB volume on the other array, and then just dump all my VM's in there.&amp;nbsp; Simple but I have read that it may not be the best performance wise.&amp;nbsp; Anyone have any best practices on how I should carve this data up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12361#M1271</guid>
      <dc:creator>csgranite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESXi and Netapp Volume size questions...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12366#M1272</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you running ONTAP 8.0.1? If not, then be wary that for 7.3.x the max deduplicated volume size is 3TB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also you should leave some 'breathing space' in the aggregate, so a sum of all volumes capacities should be smaller than the aggregate size - unless you make your volumes thin (space guarantee set to none) when it makes perfect sense to make them as big, as possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12366#M1272</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-25T17:42:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESXi and Netapp Volume size questions...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12371#M1273</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am still at ontap 7.3.x. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I figured this out a little further as far as LUNs vs. Volumes... so to ask this question a little further.&amp;nbsp; I could create a volume the same size as the aggregate or should I created multiple volumes roughly the same size as the LUNs.&amp;nbsp; See the below example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate: 5TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1: 5TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1/lun0: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1/lun1: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1/lun2: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ettc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example 2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate 5TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1: 550GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol1/lun0: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol2: 550GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol2/lun0: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol3: 550GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol3/lun0: 500GB (20% space reservation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this make sense to anyone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12371#M1273</guid>
      <dc:creator>csgranite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-25T20:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESXi and Netapp Volume size questions...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12375#M1274</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;I am keener on Example 1 - plus ideally an upgrade to 8.0.1 to be able to dedupe the volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;Re LUNs &amp;amp; space reservations: we are entering a really hairy subject &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;. Have a peak at:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/groups/chris-kranz-hardware-pro/blog/2009/03/05/fractional-reservation--lun-overwrite" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/groups/chris-kranz-hardware-pro/blog/2009/03/05/fractional-reservation--lun-overwrite&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ESXi-and-Netapp-Volume-size-questions/m-p/12375#M1274</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-26T08:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

