<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: More than one VMFS LUN perVolume in SRM envirnment in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17493#M1759</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would at a minimum require the LUNs/VMFS to be part of the same Protection Group....I'd frankly just try to stay away from it unless all the LUNS are part of a single VMFS datastore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T00:20:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>More than one VMFS LUN perVolume in SRM envirnment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17488#M1758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will this configuration work for SRM ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17488#M1758</guid>
      <dc:creator>hmarko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:07:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More than one VMFS LUN perVolume in SRM envirnment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17493#M1759</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would at a minimum require the LUNs/VMFS to be part of the same Protection Group....I'd frankly just try to stay away from it unless all the LUNS are part of a single VMFS datastore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17493#M1759</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-04T00:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More than one VMFS LUN perVolume in SRM envirnment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17498#M1760</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also read TR-3822.. "SRM..requires all datastores hosting vmdk or RDM data for a VM to be on the same storage controller."&amp;nbsp; So, a VM can't have one vmdk on a datastore on node1 and another vmdk on a datastore on&amp;nbsp; node2.&amp;nbsp; SRM requires that a VM has all vmdks on the same node (different datastores on the same node is ok).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17498#M1760</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-04T05:32:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More than one VMFS LUN perVolume in SRM envirnment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17503#M1761</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to verify it &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent using mobile device&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/More-than-one-VMFS-LUN-perVolume-in-SRM-envirnment/m-p/17503#M1761</guid>
      <dc:creator>hmarko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-04T06:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

