<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers) in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18774#M1876</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;While technically possible, I do not think this is supported. To configure it however, you'd just have to configure appropriate igroups and maps your LUNS to them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rkaramchedu1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-06T01:11:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18768#M1875</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we have some ESX servers in the cluster access a LUN via FCP while other servers in the same cluster access the LUN via iSCSI ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so - is there a Best practice / config guide ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eran B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18768#M1875</guid>
      <dc:creator>eranb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18774#M1876</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;While technically possible, I do not think this is supported. To configure it however, you'd just have to configure appropriate igroups and maps your LUNS to them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18774#M1876</guid>
      <dc:creator>rkaramchedu1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-06T01:11:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18778#M1877</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should be complete fine -- a LUN is a LUN is a LUN on NetApp (one of NetApp's advantages). I've done this as well without issues actually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll just need to make separate igroups given the igroup is tied to the protocol (FCP or iSCSI). I'd also keep the LUN ID's the same for all igroups just for sanity's sake.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:01:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18778#M1877</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-10T02:01:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18783#M1879</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd be cautious of resignaturing the datastores if you ever need to. I wouldn't be surprised if ESX made things a little troublesome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But yes, while technically possible, it would not be on my best practice and I would encourage not to use this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18783#M1879</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriskranz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-10T21:00:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simultaneously accessing LUNs via iSCSI and FCP  (different servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18788#M1881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So....that makes me think I should be a bit more complete as to where I've done this -- it's been in the context of switching over ESX datastores (so was short-term use), i.e. have the same datastore mounted via FC on one host and iSCSI on another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll defer to Chris's knowledge here. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Simultaneously-accessing-LUNs-via-iSCSI-and-FCP-different-servers/m-p/18788#M1881</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-11T02:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

