<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Paths to storage unoptimized? in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22788#M2204</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paths to the controler serving the target LUNs are the primary paths, the failover controller is the secondary 'non-optimized' paths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need access to both paths for cluster failover to work with single_image cfmode. Your multipathing on the client needs to recognize&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this and use the primary paths while available...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this response has been helpful to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eugene E. Kashpureff&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:ekashp@kashpureff.org" target="_blank"&gt;ekashp@kashpureff.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fastlane NetApp Instructor and Independent Consultant&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fastlaneus.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fastlaneus.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:15:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22784#M2203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm a bit new to the NetApp world.&amp;nbsp; I'm quite used to EMC products, and in the past with EMC, you'd have multiple paths to multiple controllers and you had redundancy that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a dual head 3170 here, and i zoned my vmware to all the ports on both heads.. The san is complaining that data is traversing through an unoptimized path.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure i could simple remove the other head from the zone, but why would i want to do that for redundancy's sake?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope someone can help explain whats going wrong or if this was just set up wrong before i got here.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22784#M2203</guid>
      <dc:creator>mneumonik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:04:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22788#M2204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paths to the controler serving the target LUNs are the primary paths, the failover controller is the secondary 'non-optimized' paths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need access to both paths for cluster failover to work with single_image cfmode. Your multipathing on the client needs to recognize&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this and use the primary paths while available...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this response has been helpful to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eugene E. Kashpureff&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:ekashp@kashpureff.org" target="_blank"&gt;ekashp@kashpureff.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fastlane NetApp Instructor and Independent Consultant&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fastlaneus.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fastlaneus.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22788#M2204</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22793#M2206</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll want to download the Virtual Storage Console for vCenter.&amp;nbsp; It will discover your paths, set your HBA timeouts correctly and help the MPIO stack choose the optimized path to the LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can download the Virtual Storage Console from the NOW site here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="https://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/software/?product=Virtual+Storage+Console+for+VMware+vSphere&amp;amp;platform=Windows" target="_blank"&gt;https://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/software/?product=Virtual+Storage+Console+for+VMware+vSphere&amp;amp;platform=Windows&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Be sure to read the documentation. For a quick overview, check out Vaughn's blog posts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualstorageguy/2009/10/now-available-the-virtual-storage-console-vsphere-plug-in.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualstorageguy/2009/10/now-available-the-virtual-storage-console-vsphere-plug-in.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualstorageguy/2010/07/netapp-vsc-20-vcenter-plug-in-announced.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualstorageguy/2010/07/netapp-vsc-20-vcenter-plug-in-announced.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22793#M2206</guid>
      <dc:creator>kritchie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:16:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22797#M2208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check to see if ALUA (Asymetric Logical Unit Access) has been enabled for the igroup for the ESX hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'igroup show -v'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To enable ALUA:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'igroup set esxigroupname alua yes'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this response has been helpful to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eugene E. Kashpureff&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:ekashp@kashpureff.org" target="_blank"&gt;ekashp@kashpureff.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fastlane NetApp Instructor and Independent Consultant&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fastlaneus.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fastlaneus.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:24:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22797#M2208</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:24:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22805#M2210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yea, seems ALUA was the issue..&amp;nbsp; I confirmed that with Netapp as well when they called for autosupport.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sidenote, would enabling ALUA on the iGroups for other servers like windows servers running Data ONTAP DSM Manager showing unoptimized paths change to optimized? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22805#M2210</guid>
      <dc:creator>mneumonik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:33:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22810#M2211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, Do NOT enable ALUA if you're using the NetApp DSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You do use ALUA with the Microsoft DSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this response has been helpful to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eugene E. Kashpureff&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:ekashp@kashpureff.org" target="_blank"&gt;ekashp@kashpureff.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fastlane NetApp Instructor and Independent Consultant&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fastlaneus.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fastlaneus.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:41:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22810#M2211</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:41:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paths to storage unoptimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22814#M2212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So how do i make the all paths optimized with netapp dsm?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider the scenario of me having a LUN on controller 1 and another on controller 2... the paths will need to be zoned and by default it tries to use all of them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Paths-to-storage-unoptimized/m-p/22814#M2212</guid>
      <dc:creator>mneumonik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:48:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

