<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Initial config of 24 disk FAS3210 in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Initial-config-of-24-disk-FAS3210/m-p/34265#M3398</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am fairly new to NetApp so hopefully I can draw on the experience of forum members. We have a new FAS3210 (dual controllers) with 24 x 15k SAS disks.&amp;nbsp; Running version 8.0.2. The SAN will be used in a VMware environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My thoughts for initial config are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HA active/passive configuration with each controller having a separate root agg/vol. thus using 6 disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 spare disks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The remaining 16 disks configured as a new aggregate on one of the controllers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another option is to split the system down the middle without separate root vols, giving 12 disks per controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 spare disks per controller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10 disks for each controllers aggregate, which after the parity disks leave 8 actual data disks. My concern is the performance of striping over just 8 disks here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other ideas? We will be growing the system within a few months by adding another shelf but i'd like to get as many usable disks out of the system now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DAVIDELLIOTT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:47:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Initial config of 24 disk FAS3210</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Initial-config-of-24-disk-FAS3210/m-p/34265#M3398</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am fairly new to NetApp so hopefully I can draw on the experience of forum members. We have a new FAS3210 (dual controllers) with 24 x 15k SAS disks.&amp;nbsp; Running version 8.0.2. The SAN will be used in a VMware environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My thoughts for initial config are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HA active/passive configuration with each controller having a separate root agg/vol. thus using 6 disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 spare disks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The remaining 16 disks configured as a new aggregate on one of the controllers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another option is to split the system down the middle without separate root vols, giving 12 disks per controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 spare disks per controller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10 disks for each controllers aggregate, which after the parity disks leave 8 actual data disks. My concern is the performance of striping over just 8 disks here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other ideas? We will be growing the system within a few months by adding another shelf but i'd like to get as many usable disks out of the system now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Initial-config-of-24-disk-FAS3210/m-p/34265#M3398</guid>
      <dc:creator>DAVIDELLIOTT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:47:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Initial config of 24 disk FAS3210</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Initial-config-of-24-disk-FAS3210/m-p/34270#M3399</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi David and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is actually a variety of threads tackling a very similar dilemma, but with even fewer disks (12):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/message/58012#58012" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/58012#58012&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;Another option is to split the system down the middle without separate root vols, giving 12 disks per controller.&lt;P&gt;2 spare disks per controller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mean 'without separate root aggregates', right? That would be my preferred way, providing you have something to put on both aggregates (i.e. at least two volumes / LUNs with some data), thus balancing the load &amp;amp; making effective use of all spindles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can then expand both aggregates (or just one of them) when adding additional disk shelves with the same type of disk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Initial-config-of-24-disk-FAS3210/m-p/34270#M3399</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-18T14:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

