<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Site recovery Manager and FlexClone Performance in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Site-recovery-Manager-and-FlexClone-Performance/m-p/41661#M4131</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;partially solves witht his burt in Dot 8.1.2P1&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #454545; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Write performance on a FlexClone is 50% of a normal Flexible Volume :&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;otherwise start vm sequencialy with priorities and dependencies (SRM features)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>c_delporte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-11T16:01:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Site recovery Manager and FlexClone Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Site-recovery-Manager-and-FlexClone-Performance/m-p/41656#M4130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With SRM 5.1.1, vCenter 5.1.1, SRA 2.0.1.P2&amp;nbsp; and Iscsi&amp;nbsp; i have performances issues when i test a plan using flexclone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The recovery site consist in a NetApp Box FAS2220 standalone with 1 RG 11 HDD SATA 1To.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VM are very slow to boot (more than 10 minutes) and lun in the volume clone have high latency report&amp;nbsp; :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 52&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 447&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 30&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 98.91&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5.03&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 /vol/testfailoverClone_nss_v10745371_WIN1_ntap47_2/WIN1_ntap47_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 51&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4480&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 23&amp;nbsp; 919.63&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 61.04&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 /vol/testfailoverClone_nss_v10745371_WIN1_ntap47_1/WIN1_ntap47_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 32.33&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.05&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 /vol/WIN1_ntap49/WIN1_ntap49&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 28&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 254&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 22&amp;nbsp; 188.07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5.06&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 /vol/testfailoverClone_nss_v10745371_WIN1_ntap47_2/WIN1_ntap47_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 57&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5780&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 22 1374.22&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 59.03&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 /vol/testfailoverClone_nss_v10745371_WIN1_ntap47_1/WIN1_ntap47_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;found this burt and upgrade DOT to 8.1.3P1 but no change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #454545;"&gt;Write performance on a FlexClone is 50% of a normal Flexible Volume&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any idea ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Site-recovery-Manager-and-FlexClone-Performance/m-p/41656#M4130</guid>
      <dc:creator>c_delporte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:56:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site recovery Manager and FlexClone Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Site-recovery-Manager-and-FlexClone-Performance/m-p/41661#M4131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;partially solves witht his burt in Dot 8.1.2P1&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="color: #454545; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Write performance on a FlexClone is 50% of a normal Flexible Volume :&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=181447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;otherwise start vm sequencialy with priorities and dependencies (SRM features)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christophe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Site-recovery-Manager-and-FlexClone-Performance/m-p/41661#M4131</guid>
      <dc:creator>c_delporte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-11T16:01:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

