<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VMWare and Netapp using FCP recommendations in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61270#M5778</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CHRISLAWLOR</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-27T09:12:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VMWare and Netapp using FCP recommendations</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61262#M5774</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a customer who has bought VMWare (vsphere 5) and a FAS 3240C - they have the FCP license and wish to present LUNS to the 3 ESXi hosts with around 3TB for virtual machines&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what would you recommend to do in terms of datastores and LUN presentation ? we were thinking to present 5 x 600GB LUNs to all 3 ESXi hosts, and create a seperate datastore per LUN, each LUN would also be in a seperate volume on the same aggregate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;im aware that we would lose the dedupe capability between the datastores with the above&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any suggestions would be great&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61262#M5774</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRISLAWLOR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:32:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMWare and Netapp using FCP recommendations</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61267#M5776</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Datastore size is a subject to a personal preference, but I would probably lean towards fewer &amp;amp; larger datastores (still sticking to the rule one datastore, one LUN per volume).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LUN-wide locking (leading to the idea of having more smaller LUNs) was a bit over-hyped in vSphere 4 &amp;amp; in version 5 this can be safely ignored completely thanks to the introduction of Atomic Test &amp;amp; Set (ATS), &lt;A class="active_link" href="http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2011/07/new-vsphere-50-storage-features-part-1-vmfs-5.html" title="http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2011/07/new-vsphere-50-storage-features-part-1-vmfs-5.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2011/07/new-vsphere-50-storage-features-part-1-vmfs-5.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the NetApp side perspective this is also worth noting - &lt;A class="active_link" href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3749.pdf" title="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3749.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3749.pdf&lt;/A&gt;, p9:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Although spanned datastores can overcome the 2TB LUN size limit, they are most commonly used to overcome scaling limits imposed by storage arrays that use per LUN I/O queues. These traditional architectures place a limit on the number of simultaneous commands that can be sent to a LUN at a given time, which can impede overall I/O performance in a datastore.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Storage arrays powered by Data ONTAP are free of this legacy architecture; therefore, NetApp does not recommend the use of spanned VMFS datastores.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61267#M5776</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-14T10:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VMWare and Netapp using FCP recommendations</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61270#M5778</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/VMWare-and-Netapp-using-FCP-recommendations/m-p/61270#M5778</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRISLAWLOR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-27T09:12:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

