<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data ONTAP Concepts &amp;amp; Questions in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7006#M646</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of your understanding is correct.&amp;nbsp; To clarify, an aggregate is made up of one or more raid groups.&amp;nbsp; You do not need to worry about creating raid groups.&amp;nbsp; You create the aggregate and set the raid group size for that aggregate and as you add disks, Ontap will manage the underlying raid groups for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding Q-1, Q-2, Q-3 use NetApp's Configuration Guide: &lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/syscfg/" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/syscfg/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For general best practices on storage layout (number of spares, raid group size, etc.) check out this Tech Report: &lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3437.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3437.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SEANMLUCE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-15T17:44:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data ONTAP Concepts &amp; Questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7001#M645</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;Hi Everyone, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;I am new to the NETAPP world, I have a few questions and will have more as I get to learn the product :-), questions are as follows :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline; font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My understanding is : &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Controller = Filer ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Each Controller is assigned Drives | Drives can be assigned from Different Disk Shelves to One Controller (FILER)?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Each Controller should have a HOT SPARE Disk of Each Type (In-case mix disks (SAS / SATA) are being assigned to one Controller (FILER) ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Both Controllers (FILERS) Keep a SYNC of each others configuration to take over in-case of a Filer (Controller) Failure ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;Anatomy = &lt;STRONG&gt;RaidGroup &amp;gt; Aggregate &amp;gt; Volumes &amp;gt; Qtrees ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A RAID Group Cannot SPAN Controllers (Filers), so Aggregates Cannot SPAN Controllers (Filers) either (Assuming two controllers managing ONE NETAPP UNIT with Multiple Shelves ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Aggregates can SPAN Multiple RAID Groups on the SAME Filer (Controller) ? [In-case, one creates multiple RAIDGROUPS on ONE (1) Filer (Controller)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Usage : File Shares (windows &amp;amp; Unix) &amp;amp; Email Server Database (Exchange 2010)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;So, I assign Filer-1 (Controller-1) 24 Disks from Shelf - 1 and 24 Disks from Shelf&amp;nbsp; - 2 to Filer (Controller) 2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;First we create a Raid Group,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;A) Now we will create a RAIDGROUP (rg0) or (rg1) or can I name it (rg&amp;lt;something&amp;gt;), so I create a RAID-DP, 2 Disks for Parity, 1 HOT SPARE Per Controller, Per Disk type, in my case all SAS Disks, so 1 SAS Spare on each Controller (FILER).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;B) On top of that RAID Group, I will create an "Aggregate", so now as I have 21 Usable Disks (Space), I will create TWO (2) Aggregates out of these 21 Disks or shall I create one large aggregate ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;C) On top of that Aggregate, we will create VOLUMES, which we will basically use for hosting File shares or Exchange Database or VMWare ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;D) On Top of Volumes, we create "QTrees", QTrees are like Logical partitions as in Windows we have C:, &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":anguished_face:"&gt;😧&lt;/span&gt; ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;So, if a RaidGroup (&lt;STRONG&gt;rg1&lt;/STRONG&gt;) is created consuming all 23 Disks with 1 Hot Spare on First Shelf, All Aggregates created there after on top will be member of the same RAIDGroup as (&lt;STRONG&gt;rg1)?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q-1 : What are the limitations, I mean how many Disks Does NETAPP recommends to allocate in a RAIDGROUP or the Maximum Number of Disks that can be part of a RaidGroup on NetAPP?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q-2 : 64-BIT Aggregates can be more than 16TB in Size? Any Best practice or Recommendation for Aggregates ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q-3 : Maximum Number of Disks a Controller (Filer) can Handle? For e.g. if in future, we add another 2 Shelves, can we simply add those 2 more shelves to just one of the Controller (Filer) we have ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Will be grateful if some netapp expert can have a look at my notes above, this will help me clarify my concepts prior getting trained on the product itself, this is the out-come of self learning, foreseeing our executives investing in NetAPP.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks and Regards&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Netapporati &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; (in-process) &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:41:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7001#M645</guid>
      <dc:creator>NETAPPORATI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:41:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data ONTAP Concepts &amp; Questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7006#M646</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of your understanding is correct.&amp;nbsp; To clarify, an aggregate is made up of one or more raid groups.&amp;nbsp; You do not need to worry about creating raid groups.&amp;nbsp; You create the aggregate and set the raid group size for that aggregate and as you add disks, Ontap will manage the underlying raid groups for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding Q-1, Q-2, Q-3 use NetApp's Configuration Guide: &lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/syscfg/" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/syscfg/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For general best practices on storage layout (number of spares, raid group size, etc.) check out this Tech Report: &lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3437.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3437.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7006#M646</guid>
      <dc:creator>SEANMLUCE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-15T17:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data ONTAP Concepts &amp; Questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7013#M647</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Few things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Both Controllers (FILERS) Keep a SYNC of each others configuration to take over in-case of a Filer (Controller) Failure ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, not exactly - if one controller fails, its virtual identity is run inside of the surviving partner. You can actually misconfigure a number of things (apply different settings to two controllers, e.g. different VLANs, etc.), so your cluster fail-over ends up not very nicely. There is a tool for checking the cluster setup though: &lt;A class="active_link" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/cf_config_check/" title="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/cf_config_check/" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/cf_config_check/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;On Top of Volumes, we create "QTrees", QTrees are like Logical partitions as in Windows we have C:, D: ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nope - qtrees are subfolders of a NetApp volume, so you can have some files inside a qtree; or you can have a LUN inside a qtree (or inside the root of the volume for that matter)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: calibri,verdana,arial,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Any Best practice or Recommendation for Aggregates ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have access to Field Portal, Storage Subsystem FAQ&amp;nbsp; your best doc to answer these types of questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=7178&amp;amp;docid=9866" title="https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=7178&amp;amp;docid=9866" target="_blank"&gt;https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=7178&amp;amp;docid=9866&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7013#M647</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-15T18:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data ONTAP Concepts &amp; Questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7020#M648</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi SeanMLuce and Radek Kubka,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for your replies - it has been helpful, I got busy and hence the delay in responding back here, I will post some more questions either on this thread or will create a new thread&amp;nbsp; - Once again thanks so much for your replies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:59:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Data-ONTAP-Concepts-amp-Questions/m-p/7020#M648</guid>
      <dc:creator>NETAPPORATI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-20T15:59:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

