<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Takeover Issues with 3240 HA Pair in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76626#M7375</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi the last two times we have completed takeovers on one of our controllers of our busiest filers we have issues with vmware Linux guests. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a high level system configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3240 controllers in HA Pair&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 SAS disk shelves (600GB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SATA disk shelves (2TB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 stacks (1 for SAS and 1 for SATA)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SAS aggregates (1 per controller)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SATA aggregates (1 per controller)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issues are usually with VMware datastores during the takeover. These datastores are 8Gb FC. What happens is when we perform a takeover the linux guests in the datastores put there root file systems into Read Only mode. I assume this is due to latency which does get rather high and Linux attempts to protect itself. The Windows guests recover on giveback. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure why this happens and if it is purely due to latency or not. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any of the experts here have any ideas of what the potential issue or issues could be? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WICKEDSHARK</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Takeover Issues with 3240 HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76626#M7375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi the last two times we have completed takeovers on one of our controllers of our busiest filers we have issues with vmware Linux guests. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a high level system configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3240 controllers in HA Pair&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 SAS disk shelves (600GB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SATA disk shelves (2TB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 stacks (1 for SAS and 1 for SATA)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SAS aggregates (1 per controller)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 SATA aggregates (1 per controller)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issues are usually with VMware datastores during the takeover. These datastores are 8Gb FC. What happens is when we perform a takeover the linux guests in the datastores put there root file systems into Read Only mode. I assume this is due to latency which does get rather high and Linux attempts to protect itself. The Windows guests recover on giveback. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure why this happens and if it is purely due to latency or not. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any of the experts here have any ideas of what the potential issue or issues could be? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76626#M7375</guid>
      <dc:creator>WICKEDSHARK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Takeover Issues with 3240 HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76631#M7376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you set disk io timeout to 190s in VMs? We find Linux is a lot more sensitive to this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76631#M7376</guid>
      <dc:creator>DILIDOLO2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-04T00:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Takeover Issues with 3240 HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76640#M7377</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok I see this KB article now for ESX 4 and higher 180 seconds is recommended. I thought VMware tools did this already. I know it sets Windows to 60 seconds but I guess Linux needs longer to respond. I will look into this further. More information on the ESX KB here is the link. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&amp;amp;docType=kc&amp;amp;externalId=1009465&amp;amp;sliceId=1&amp;amp;docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&amp;amp;dialogID=122102300&amp;amp;stateId=0%200%20129155652" title="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&amp;amp;docType=kc&amp;amp;externalId=1009465&amp;amp;sliceId=1&amp;amp;docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&amp;amp;dialogID=122102300&amp;amp;stateId=0%200%20129155652" target="_blank"&gt;http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&amp;amp;docType=kc&amp;amp;externalId=1009465&amp;amp;sliceId=1&amp;amp;docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&amp;amp;dialogID=122102300&amp;amp;stateId=0%200%20129155652&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76640#M7377</guid>
      <dc:creator>WICKEDSHARK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-04T01:52:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Takeover Issues with 3240 HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76645#M7378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a late reply but I just wanted to share a KB article that documents this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2010823" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2010823" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2010823&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your issue persists, please contact &lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com" target="_blank"&gt;NetApp Technical Support&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Takeover-Issues-with-3240-HA-Pair/m-p/76645#M7378</guid>
      <dc:creator>christin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-08T21:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

