<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design rules- FAS3020 in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76985#M7416</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;How are you copying the vm?  Winscp?  RAID-DP is native to netapp and protects from double disk failure You should always use RAID-DP, your data is worth more than saving one or two disks from configuring a less resilient raid type.  You may want to check network cables and switch saturation or firewall port blocking.  Hope this helps.  &lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 06:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arsenalsoccer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-05T06:13:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76970#M7413</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In just a very few words:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 2 yrs ago FAS3020 was installed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- design was made by 3rd party&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- demand has grown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- environment has grown from 2 heads with 2 shelfs to 6 shelfs (metro cluster)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- design has never been reviewed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and now... we have performance issues. Copying a VM from one LUN to another LUN (ESX) spikes filer cpu to 99% and latency on ESX side goes up to 200ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I don't know anything about designing volumes, plexes, LUNs etc. so I'm now looking for some docs on general design rules. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have questions like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- how many shelfs and disks can you just "stick" together in one big volume?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Everything is configured as Raid-DP. Is Raid-DP even the best for Oracle? On other storage I would use Raid-10 and Raid-5 for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- In the volume I can see a mix of 10k and 15k disks and 144GB and 300GB disks. Normally I would avoid that, can NetApp handle that? I know the WAFL system is good, but .... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway... links to good docs on these topics are very welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabrie van Zanten&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.GabesVirtualWorld.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.GabesVirtualWorld.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76970#M7413</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabrievanzanten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76973#M7414</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabrie -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Welcome to NetApp Communities !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ouch ! Sounds like you may have inherited a dino mess !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mixing disk drive sizes is a bad thing. Mixing 10K w/ 15K disk is worse !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can build a 16TB volume/aggregate with Data ONTAP 7.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some links ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main NOW site doc page:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/docs.cgi" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/docs.cgi&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Data ONTAP doc page:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/ontap_index.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/ontap_index.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Database Best Practices:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/bpg/db/oracle_faq.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/bpg/db/oracle_faq.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this response has been helpful to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eugene E. Kashpureff&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:ekashp@kashpureff.org" target="_blank"&gt;ekashp@kashpureff.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Senior Systems Architect / NetApp Certified Instructor&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekashpureff&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76973#M7414</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-04T01:44:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76982#M7415</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx, I will start with these docs &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76982#M7415</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabrievanzanten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-04T10:40:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76985#M7416</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;How are you copying the vm?  Winscp?  RAID-DP is native to netapp and protects from double disk failure You should always use RAID-DP, your data is worth more than saving one or two disks from configuring a less resilient raid type.  You may want to check network cables and switch saturation or firewall port blocking.  Hope this helps.  &lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 06:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76985#M7416</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsenalsoccer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-05T06:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76989#M7417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm copying using the VMware Infrastructure Client. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand Raid-DP offers good protection, but is it the best choice in all situations? Would you run Oracle transaction logs on Raid-DP or rather use Raid10 for example?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabrie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76989#M7417</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabrievanzanten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-07T07:17:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76993#M7418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a little follow up about issues that have now been pinpointed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Our aggregate had filled up to 97%. We didn't know this was against best practise. Now cleaned up some space and are back at 85%. Wasting about 1 TB &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Turned out a number of volumes were fragmented. After running reallocate measure, two volumes reported an optimization of 6 and four volumes reported an optimization of 4. I've now scheduled optimizations to take place each saturday night. Two two oracle volumes are now back at optimization 1 and 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are seeing slight improvements. Last step I'm going to take now is aligning all VMs that are on the NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately we're running ESXi, so the NetApp mbralign tool won't work &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt; Looking for a solution to this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabrie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76993#M7418</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabrievanzanten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-28T09:16:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design rules- FAS3020</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76998#M7419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp offers RAID_DP or RAID4. And Ontap till date does not offer different raid for different RAID groups under the same aggregate. So if u have different container for ur transaction logs, u may have RAID4 but that would be risky!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check these Netapp TR's hope they may help:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3369.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3369.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/wp-7009-oracle-asm.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/wp-7009-oracle-asm.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3391.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3391.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Design-rules-FAS3020/m-p/76998#M7419</guid>
      <dc:creator>tirtha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-28T12:01:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

