<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ACP interface and WINS in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77050#M7425</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're using Snaplock and I'm not terribly interested in beta testing the new 7G + GX version of ontap.&amp;nbsp; That means 7.3 until 8.1 proves itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I'm not seeing the big case for 7.3.6.&amp;nbsp; I've no need for SMB 2.0 with snaplock, I don't use NFS, and I'm not getting 1TB pam cards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless the ACP/SA improvements will make our SMSQL / VMWare rollout smoother I'm having a hard time justifying the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GTNDADABO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-02T18:47:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77032#M7420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Had an interesting one this morning.&amp;nbsp; My ACP interface decided to do two things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Turn WINS on (i've got it shut off in /etc/rc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Register with my WINS servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fortunately I caught it before we had any issues; however, I'd like to avoid this in the future.&amp;nbsp; (A simple ifconfig e0a -wins and a clean up of dns is all it took.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What was I doing this morning?&amp;nbsp; Verifying my documentation by checking aggregate disk layout using SM2.0rc1.&amp;nbsp; I tried repeating my steps to see if the wins flag went away a second time but no luck.&amp;nbsp; I see no-one else in the systems this morning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I've got an interface that "shouldn't" have gotten out into the wild and an ifconfig flag that "shouldn't" have changed (according to support.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen either their ACP connection information get out into the wild or an ifconfig flag randomly change?&amp;nbsp; Alternately, any recommendations on forensics?&amp;nbsp; I've looked through messages and acp_master and did not see any obviously suspicious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77032#M7420</guid>
      <dc:creator>GTNDADABO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77036#M7421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We saw this on some systems early when ACP was new... what ontap version?&amp;nbsp; There are some BURTS on wins and acp too&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=433010" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=433010&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77036#M7421</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T17:21:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77041#M7422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;DoT 7.3.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACP's been installed the entire time; however, we did upgrade firmware a couple of weeks ago (to 1.2.0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the logs the WINS registration started with morning, not after the firmware upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fix recommended in that article is what I did.&amp;nbsp; I'm mostly worried about:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. preventing it from happening in the future&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. the possibility of my public facing interfaces flags changing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77041#M7422</guid>
      <dc:creator>GTNDADABO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T17:26:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77045#M7423</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would upgrade ontap to 7.3.6p2 if you are staying in the 7.3 codeline. A lot of SA and acp fixes. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone 4S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77045#M7423</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T17:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77050#M7425</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're using Snaplock and I'm not terribly interested in beta testing the new 7G + GX version of ontap.&amp;nbsp; That means 7.3 until 8.1 proves itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I'm not seeing the big case for 7.3.6.&amp;nbsp; I've no need for SMB 2.0 with snaplock, I don't use NFS, and I'm not getting 1TB pam cards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless the ACP/SA improvements will make our SMSQL / VMWare rollout smoother I'm having a hard time justifying the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77050#M7425</guid>
      <dc:creator>GTNDADABO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T18:47:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77055#M7427</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;7.3.6P2 is a minor upgrade from 7.3.4 but I understand the hesitation to upgrade if no other issues... there is a SAS bug (HBA driver updated) that is a rare case but still a P1 but that I would upgrade to not have that issue.&amp;nbsp; 7.3.6 is still in the 7.3.x codeline and has the SAS/ACP fixes without ugprading to 8.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77055#M7427</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T18:57:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACP interface and WINS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77060#M7429</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For any curious here was our issue:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/etc/rc had the line:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig e0a `hostname`-e0a -wins -no_ddns&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because there's no hardcoded address for `hostname`-e0a in /etc/hosts (ACP handles the IP) the command failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Resolving the issue was simple removing `hostname`-e0a from the line and leaving -wins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/ACP-interface-and-WINS/m-p/77060#M7429</guid>
      <dc:creator>GTNDADABO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T15:25:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

