<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Netapp Storage &amp;amp; VMWare Topology in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8167#M805</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am new to virtualization, does anyone have a good topology they can share for using vmware with storage?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do see using layer 3 switches trunked with the storage seems to be recomended, can this be off the core switches or should this be separate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jalee12345</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Netapp Storage &amp; VMWare Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8167#M805</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am new to virtualization, does anyone have a good topology they can share for using vmware with storage?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do see using layer 3 switches trunked with the storage seems to be recomended, can this be off the core switches or should this be separate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8167#M805</guid>
      <dc:creator>jalee12345</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Netapp Storage &amp; VMWare Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8172#M806</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look at TR-3802 Ethernet Storage and, of course, TR-3749 NetApp and VMware vSphere Best Practices, at first.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These docs are good point for beginners.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8172#M806</guid>
      <dc:creator>roman_verysell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-23T21:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Netapp Storage &amp; VMWare Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8177#M807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #575757; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Is it best practice (or should I ask how do I get the maximum&lt;BR /&gt;performance) to have a smaller number of large aggregates or to have specialized&lt;BR /&gt;"types of data" based aggregates such as SQL Database Aggregates and&lt;BR /&gt;carve out datastores and only put SQL Databases in those datastores. Then have&lt;BR /&gt;SQL Transaction Logs aggregates and carve out datastores and only put SQL&lt;BR /&gt;Transaction logs in those datastores. Then have ORACLE&lt;BR /&gt;aggregrates.etc....etc.....Or should I have aggregates based on sequential and&lt;BR /&gt;non-sequential read/writes and place my datastores in those aggregates? Various&lt;BR /&gt;storage admins have told me that you should only have one or two very large&lt;BR /&gt;64bit aggregates and dump everything in them and this is just as good as&lt;BR /&gt;anything else and you get the most IOPS. Then other admins state you should&lt;BR /&gt;have aggregates based on the type of traffic. So I am not sure who to believe.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8177#M807</guid>
      <dc:creator>chadfisette</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-25T18:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Netapp Storage &amp; VMWare Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8181#M808</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my point off view best practice are separate os ( same) with dedup , database with compression. If you have Only one ctrl create 2 agregate to separate database and log but more simple is your configuration more better she Will be&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Netapp-Storage-amp-VMWare-Topology/m-p/8181#M808</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapp_po</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-25T18:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

