<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/110276#M8312</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;is there any risk if we unselect the spanned entities on the smvi job?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below are the snapshot but have same snapshot. Is it safe to delete redundant snapshots unselect the spanned entities accordingly on the smvi job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG title="4.jpg" alt="4.jpg" src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3720i85BC58F7EBB7C346/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;IMG title="3.jpg" alt="3.jpg" src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3719i2EAD1575B92B075A/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>akamal8</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-29T07:04:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11565#M1174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using SMVI for backups of an ESX virtualisation infrastructure. I present around 20 luns through fiber to the ESX hosts. There is one lun per volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the backups work ok, I noticed that one volume seems to be snapshotted 2 times. The output makes you think that the volume is in 2 different jobs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the schedules in the netapp vCenter plugin and this volume is actually only configured 1 time. However the snapshot names make me think somehow it gets taken into another job as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One job starts at 23:30 and another at 00:30. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if this is a bug in SMVI or if this has something to do with ESX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Volume vol16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;working...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; %/used&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; %/total&amp;nbsp; date&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------&amp;nbsp; ----------&amp;nbsp; ------------&amp;nbsp; --------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 2% ( 2%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 10 01:52&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120110003000 (snapvault)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 09 23:59&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120109233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 09 00:36&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120109003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 4% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 07 23:37&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 weekly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_recent &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 5% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 07 01:26&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 weekly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_recent &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 06 23:40&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120106233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 06 01:01&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120106003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 05 23:38&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120105233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 7% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 05 01:02&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120105003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 8% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 04 23:45&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120104233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 8% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 04 01:08&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120104003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 9% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 03 23:46&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120103233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 9% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 03 01:10&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120103003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 9% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 02 23:45&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120102233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 10% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 02 00:31&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20120102003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 10% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 01 02:31&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 monthly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_recent &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 11% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Jan 01 01:31&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 monthly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_recent &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 11% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Dec 31 23:44&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 weekly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20111231233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 12% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Dec 31 00:45&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 4 weekly backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20111231003000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 12% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; Dec 30 23:35&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20111230233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 13% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Dec 29 23:38&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20111229233000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 14% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10% ( 1%)&amp;nbsp; Dec 28 23:38&amp;nbsp; smvi_Group 2 daily backup remote snapvault enabled_novmsnap_20111228233000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11565#M1174</guid>
      <dc:creator>GVM666GVM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-11T13:03:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11571#M1176</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be checking smvi logs will help you trace any error or duplicate jobs.. for eg path collect logs "C:\Program Files\NetApp\SMVI\server\log" and then download smvi log viewer from Netapp support site and follow below instructions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;. Unzip the archive to your local system&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Double-click SMVILogViewer.exe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Select the File menu and the Open option &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Select one or more SMVI server log files &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. Wait for the files to finish parsing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The operations pane (top half) has a right-click menu to select which operations to view based on their exit status (Success, Fail, Unknown, All). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The messages pane (bottom half) has a right-click menu to select which messages to view (from all messages to only error messages).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you wish to view the contents of the currently live server log file, you will need to copy the file to another name first.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-DEV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11571#M1176</guid>
      <dc:creator>sharmadevender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-11T14:04:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11576#M1179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the reports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing I noticed: with removing vol16 no new snapshots have been created. Not in name of group 2 or group 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if it might have something to do with spanned entities that go over multiple datastores?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:32:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11576#M1179</guid>
      <dc:creator>GVM666GVM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-11T15:32:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11580#M1180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It may be one of the reason but frankly speaking not sure.. Need to have a thorough look to logs and environment..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-DEV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11580#M1180</guid>
      <dc:creator>sharmadevender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-11T16:00:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11585#M1181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems like I never took the time to update this thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will do it now... maybe it helps someone else out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason that it was taken in 2 jobs was indeed because of the vmdks being spread over 2 datastores.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you can either deselect the vmdk from the spanned entities or you can move the vmdk to the same datastore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went for the latter one as there was still enough space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that all went fine again &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks anyway for your reply sharmadevender!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/11585#M1181</guid>
      <dc:creator>GVM666GVM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-28T08:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI: volume is taken in multiple jobs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/110276#M8312</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;is there any risk if we unselect the spanned entities on the smvi job?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below are the snapshot but have same snapshot. Is it safe to delete redundant snapshots unselect the spanned entities accordingly on the smvi job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG title="4.jpg" alt="4.jpg" src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3720i85BC58F7EBB7C346/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;IMG title="3.jpg" alt="3.jpg" src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3719i2EAD1575B92B075A/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-volume-is-taken-in-multiple-jobs/m-p/110276#M8312</guid>
      <dc:creator>akamal8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-29T07:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

