<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Future of VSC6 in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136590#M9132</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Alex,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply, it is very unfortunate that the old backup functionality is removed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The snapshots I normally use are indeed quiesced snapshots and at this site, there is no snapmirror/snapvault involved. We do maintain several netapps at customers where we do use SnapVault to store the Snapshots elsewhere and for a longer period of time where also vmware essentials is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So our best options are probably to use either Veeam or the build in option of the NetApp as you suggested. I will try to test Veeam to see what is included in the free edition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sander&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>elhefe1982</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-08T05:56:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Future of VSC6</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136586#M9130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a small environment with just 3 vmware hosts, approx 150 virtuals and recently got a FAS2600.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I downloaded VSC7 and was suprised that the backup option was completely removed. Then I read about Snapcenter 3.0 and the VMWare plugin but unfortunately, this is really not an option for small companies.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have VMWare essentials and upgrading VMWare just to support VMotion which is required for the snapcenter vmware plugin would cost us more then the whole NetAPP system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I will try to go back to VSC6.2 and hope it works well with the latest vcenter 6.5 and ontap 9.2 but I am concerned about the future. Will NetAPP continue support for VSC6 versions or perhaps have plans to put backup back into the VSC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136586#M9130</guid>
      <dc:creator>elhefe1982</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of VSC6</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136587#M9131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not in a position to comment on VSC plans, but I don't believe our usual practice is to support multiple generations of products in such a way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm more interested in how you're using VSC right now - are you using it to make quiesced snapshots of each VM? without any form of snapmirror/snapvault? If so, Veeam might be a good option to look at. There is a free version which has very good functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, just taking snapshots using the built in snapshot scheduling of ONTAP is always an option. I ran a 1800 VM environment like this for several years - the VMs were crash consistent (vs quiesced), but in those three years we only once had an issue where the most recent snapshot did not work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:36:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136587#M9131</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T05:36:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of VSC6</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136590#M9132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Alex,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply, it is very unfortunate that the old backup functionality is removed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The snapshots I normally use are indeed quiesced snapshots and at this site, there is no snapmirror/snapvault involved. We do maintain several netapps at customers where we do use SnapVault to store the Snapshots elsewhere and for a longer period of time where also vmware essentials is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So our best options are probably to use either Veeam or the build in option of the NetApp as you suggested. I will try to test Veeam to see what is included in the free edition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sander&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136590#M9132</guid>
      <dc:creator>elhefe1982</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T05:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of VSC6</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136591#M9133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No problem - you can still use snapmirror/snapvault with the built in snapshot functionality, and while Veeam can orchestrate it, I know remote replication is not part of the free edition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should also clarify that "crash consistent" is not a uniform term - I mean a snapshot that is consistent to the point in time of a crash.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 06:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/Future-of-VSC6/m-p/136591#M9133</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T06:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

