<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs in VMware Solutions Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9150#M922</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Amrita.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for my knowledge and better understanding of the product/technology, why will virtual mode RDMs not work with SMVI? If VMware can take a snapshot of it, I thought SMVI would be ok then. The VM in question which has it does not have SDW installed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any plans to make virtual RDMs compatible in a future version? Sure would be nice &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" height="16" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.6/images/emoticons/happy.gif" width="16"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>collieritops</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-12T13:15:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9117#M910</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a VM which is running SQL Server 2005 and has the following disks:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 30GB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VMDK&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; datastore1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":anguished_face:"&gt;😧&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 500GB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RDM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; "Virtual Mode"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; datastore2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10GB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VMDK&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; datastore1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS/program files is on C: and SQL databases, program files and DB dumps are located on drive &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":anguished_face:"&gt;😧&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does SMVI handle backing up Virtual Mode RDMs? I read that it doesn't work with physical mode but wasn't sure about virtual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should all of the disks be in the same ESX datastore? Otherwise I think this VM is going to get snapped twice and we could have to recover two different datastore/volumes for SFR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. SMSQL is not an option unfortunately.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9117#M910</guid>
      <dc:creator>collieritops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9121#M911</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a tad complex story.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First &amp;amp; foremost, if you want to do VSS-assisted application-consistent snapshots, then be wary of this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/library/technical-reports/tr-3737.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/library/technical-reports/tr-3737.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, page 28&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"All application data needs to be contained on virtual disks (VMDKs) in NFS or VMFS datastores,&lt;BR /&gt;and&lt;STRONG&gt; not on RDMs&lt;/STRONG&gt; or LUNs that are accessed using the Microsoft iSCSI Software Initiator in the&lt;BR /&gt;guest OS."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(plus have a look at the table on page 30&lt;EM&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an interesting thread about using SMVI only vs. SMVI + SnapManager products:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/thread/3267" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/thread/3267&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:47:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9121#M911</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T20:47:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9126#M913</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I checked out tr-3737 and the table on page 30 you refer to says "physical mode" RDMs. "Virtual Mode" RDMs (what I have) are a little different animal since VMware can take a snapshot of them -- and since that is the case, I figure why wouldn't it work with SMVI then? I searched tr-3737 for "virtual mode" and got 0 results..it seems to only reference physical mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I'm aiming for here is "guest/file system level consistency"...not really application level. We are taking care of the SQL application backups via flat file dumps...so if I get the file system consistent, I've got what I need for this case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9126#M913</guid>
      <dc:creator>collieritops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T20:54:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9130#M915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that physical mode RDM is a must for SnapDrive / SnapManager environment (SD doesn't support virtual mode RDMs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This isn't quite clear for me whether virtual mode RDM will actually cause any trouble for SMVI to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally I'd probably split SQL database from dumps into different drives - you can leave the former outside of SMVI, keep the latter as plain VMDK &amp;amp; back it up using SMVI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9130#M915</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T21:13:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9139#M918</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with Radek there. And you make a very good point about virtual mode RDM's. We will update the documentation with this as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REgards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amrita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 06:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9139#M918</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T06:42:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9143#M919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMVI and SDW will not work on virtual mode RDM's. We will updatet the documentation with this information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amrita &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9143#M919</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T07:37:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9150#M922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Amrita.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for my knowledge and better understanding of the product/technology, why will virtual mode RDMs not work with SMVI? If VMware can take a snapshot of it, I thought SMVI would be ok then. The VM in question which has it does not have SDW installed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any plans to make virtual RDMs compatible in a future version? Sure would be nice &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" height="16" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.6/images/emoticons/happy.gif" width="16"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9150#M922</guid>
      <dc:creator>collieritops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T13:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI and Virtual Mode RDMs</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9154#M923</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess it was design decision which was taken not to support virtual RDM's. I can definitely take this down as a requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REgards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amrita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/VMware-Solutions-Discussions/SMVI-and-Virtual-Mode-RDMs/m-p/9154#M923</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T13:18:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

