ONTAP Discussions
ONTAP Discussions
Hi.
Data Ontap 7.3.3 on both boxes.
One of our snapvault replication is frozen (the progress size doesn't change) but I dont know how to unfreeze this situation.
Here is the "snapvault status -l" :
myfiler> snapvault status -l srcfiler:/vol/vol3/Metiers
Snapvault is ON.
Source: srcfiler:/vol/vol3/Metiers
Destination: myfiler:/vol/sv_803_vol3/Metiers
Status: Transferring
Progress: 36449116 KB
State: Snapvaulted
Lag: 1358:50:23
Mirror Timestamp: Wed Apr 11 20:00:55 CEST 2012
Base Snapshot: myfiler(0135067612)_sv_803_vol3-base.0
Current Transfer Type: Update
Current Transfer Error: -
Contents: Transitioning
Last Transfer Type: Update
Last Transfer Size: 1576360 KB
Last Transfer Duration: 01:35:05
Last Transfer From: srcfiler:/vol/vol3/Metiers
The snapshot from Wed Apr 11 20:00:55 CEST 2012 is still here on the srcfiler :
srcfiler> snap list
Volume vol3
working...
%/used %/total date name
---------- ---------- ------------ --------
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 07 00:01 hourly.0
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 06 20:01 journalier.0 (acs)
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 06 12:00 hourly.1
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 06 00:01 hourly.2
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 05 20:01 journalier.1
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 05 12:00 hourly.3
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jun 05 00:01 hourly.4
1% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jun 04 12:00 hourly.5
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Jun 04 00:01 hourly.6
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Jun 03 12:00 hourly.7
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Jun 03 00:01 hourly.8
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Jun 02 12:00 hourly.9
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Jun 02 00:01 hourly.10
2% ( 1%) 2% ( 1%) Jun 01 12:00 hourly.11
2% ( 0%) 2% ( 0%) Jun 01 00:01 hourly.12
2% ( 0%) 2% ( 0%) May 31 12:01 hourly.13
3% ( 2%) 3% ( 1%) Apr 11 20:00 journalier.2 (snapvault)
And on the "target" filer :
myfiler> snap list sv_803_vol3
Volume sv_803_vol3
working...
%/used %/total date name
---------- ---------- ------------ --------
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 11 21:58 journalier.0
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 11 21:40 myfiler(0135067612)_sv_803_vol3-base.0 (busy,snapvault)
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 10 22:57 journalier.1
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 09 20:37 journalier.2
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 08 20:34 journalier.3
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 08 13:56 journalier.4
0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 07 14:27 journalier.5
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Apr 05 22:04 journalier.6
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Apr 04 21:44 journalier.7
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Apr 03 23:12 journalier.8
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Apr 03 01:25 journalier.9
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Apr 01 20:28 journalier.10
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Mar 31 21:50 journalier.11
1% ( 0%) 1% ( 0%) Mar 31 03:23 journalier.12
2% ( 1%) 2% ( 1%) Mar 29 22:00 journalier.13
Tks to help me.
Hi,
Can you simply try snapvault abort command?
Regards,
Radek
I can try, but my volume is about 880 GB, and I don't want to snapvault the entire volume through a WAN connection with low bandwidth. I have to be sure that the snapshot (which is old) will be resynchronized.
I'm not sure of what the snapvault abort do, I dont want to lose snapshots of April 11th.
Tks
Does this help?
abort [-f] [ -h ] [dst_filer:]dst_path
abort -s volname snapname
Available on the primary and secondary. Cancels transfers to all dst_paths specified or, with the -s option, cancels the creation of a snapshot. The destination dst_path is on the secondary for normal updates, but is on the primary for restores. When cancelling a snapshot creation, the command also cancels all update transfers initiated as part of creating the snapshot.
Any transfer with a restart checkpoint (you can view this via the snapvault status command) may be restartable; to clear out the restart checkpoint and force any subsequent transfer to start from the beginning and possibly a different snapshot on the primary, you can use abort -h on the dst_path. The -h option specifies that this is a hard abort; the restart checkpoint will be cleared out in addition to the transfer being stopped.
The abort command can be invoked from either the primary or the secondary filer. However, the -h option is only effective on the destination filer. The option will be ignored if specified on the source filer.
The -f option forces the abort command to proceed without first asking for confirmation from the user.
Are you sure that after this abort, it will restart from the snapshot of April 11th ?
Do the "snapvault update" command works to restart the transfer ?
If you don't use -s option, then yes - it should restart the transfer from the last checkpoint.
I made a snapshot abort, then snapshot update, it seems to work, the transfer has restarted from the same Base snapshot.
Tks a lot.