Below is the error message I received when trying to connect NetApp C250AFF to an S3 browser. S3 Browser Version 11.6.7 Error Message: Unable to perform requested action Error occurred during getting buckets list System.Net.WebException Server Response: The remote name could not be resolved Appreciate if someone could share your inputs / suggestions to resolve this issue.
... View more
what is the best RAID configration below and why "A" RAID type: RAID-DP Drive model: 15300 GB SSD Total number of drives: 26 Number of hot spares: 1 WAFL overhead (%): 5 Aggregate snapshot reserve (%):5 Volume snapshot reserve (%):10 Total number of drives per aggr: 25 Number of data drives per aggr.: 23 Number of RAID groups per aggr.: 1 space usable 255.6 TB "B" AID type: RAID-DP Drive model: 15300 GB SSD Total number of drives: 26 (13 per RAID) Total Number of hot spares per raid: 2 WAFL overhead (%): 5 Aggregate snapshot reserve (%):5 Volume snapshot reserve (%):10 Total number of drives per aggr: 11 Number of data drives per aggr.: 10 Number of RAID groups per aggr.: 2 space usable 116.2 TB
... View more
Hi, I trying to scratch the entire AFF A300 cluster before sending it back to Netapp(trade-in). I did it on a FAS2620 without any problems, but on the A300 it interrups before it's completed (I have seen max 50% done). I boot ontap to menu, runs 9a on boths nodes, startup node1 into maintenance mode and then "disk assign all". After starting disk sanitization ( disk sanitize start -p 0x22 <disk> ), get some warnings/errors but it starts. *> disk sanitize start -r 0d.01.0 Apr 23 08:06:55 [cl01-02:raid.assim.tree.noRootVol:error]: No usable root volume was found! ERROR: Failed to recognize disks: . Still continuing... WARNING: Disk sanitization will remove all data from the selected disks and cannot be recovered. Do you want to continue (y/n)? y WARNING: The sanitization process might include a disk format. If the system is power-cycled or rebooted during a disk format, the disk might become unreadable. The process will attempt to restart the format after 10 minutes. The time required for the sanitization process might be significant, depending on the size of the disk and the number of patterns and cycles specified. Do you want to continue (y/n)? y Apr 23 08:06:59 [cl01-02:disk.outOfService:notice]: Drive 0d.01.0 (S3SGNF0M306362): message received. Power-On Hours: N/A, GList Count: 0, Drive Info: Disk 0d.01.0 Shelf 1 Bay 0 [NETAPP X357_S16433T8ATE NA55] S/N [S3SGNF0M306362] UID [5002538B:4932D5C0:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000]. The disk sanitization process has been initiated. When it is complete, a message will be displayed on the console. Apr 23 08:06:59 [cl01-02:disk.releaseFailed:error]: Disk release failed on 0a.01.0 CDB 0x5f:0601 - SCSI:not ready (2 4 1b) *> disk sanitize status ERROR: Failed to recognize disks: No disks to read. Apr 23 08:08:24 [cl01-02:raid.assim.tree.noRootVol:error]: No usable root volume was found! . Still continuing... Sanitization for 0a.01.0 is 4% complete. *> disk sanitize status Apr 23 08:22:28 [cl01-02:raid.assim.tree.noRootVol:error]: No usable root volume was found! ERROR: Failed to recognize disks: . Still continuing... Sanitization for 0a.01.0 is 47% complete. *> disk sanitize status Apr 23 08:40:17 [cl01-02:raid.assim.tree.noRootVol:error]: No usable root volume was found! ERROR: Failed to recognize disks: . Still continuing... *> Apr 23 08:40:17 [cl01-02:diskown.diskWasStolen:notice]: Disk 0d.01.0 (S/N S3SGNF0M306362) has had its ownership changed so that it is no longer owned by this system. This can lead to a system panic if the disk is a filesytem disk. Why is the ownership changed? Is that the reason it fails? I have a case with Netapp, but since the service agreement ended last month I don't know if they will help me, waiting for answer. //Fredric
... View more
In fusion i have a solution but it appears that this solution is already configured. This solution only has 16 SSD disks and that we can only use the data aggregates that the solution provides. If i remove the data aggregates from the solution to then try and create only one lager aggregate , it only allows a one size to be created. It appears that we cannot remove the two data aggregates and create one large one instead,. Is this a restriction due to ADP? Due we just have to use the configuration that is shown below utilizing the two 4.8 TiB data aggregates ? Other systems allows creation of one large aggregate but they dont use ADP.
... View more
Can anyone help me understand the difference between part - DS224C-0-24-N-C & part DS224C-0-24-C. These parts and their description look exactly the same, the only difference is "-N". I want to understand what this "-N" stands for and what is it used for.
... View more