I have installed SnapCenter 4.2.0 agents in two node SQL Server cluster with active-active configuration. But SnapCenter only can access to the instances running in the node which own cluster name resource. Does anybody know how can I work with the instances on the secod cluster node?
When I say active/active I mean that each node runs different instances of SQL Server. For example:
- Node 1 executes instances A and B - Node 2 executes instances C and D
SnapCenter can only access instances that run on the node that has the cluster name. If the cluster name is on node 1, SnapCenter only accesses instances A and B. If the cluster name is on node 2, SnapCenter only accesses instances C and D.
This problem has nothing to do with the disjoint namespace. In order to work with all instances the nodes have to be able to access the SQL Browser service, which we had disabled. By enabling it all instances are accessible by Snapcenter.
Installing plug-ins on a cluster: (I don't know if AlwaysOn means Active/Active) If you install plug-ins on a cluster (WSFC, Oracle RAC, SQL Always OnAvailability Groups, or Exchange DAG), they are installed on all of the nodes of the cluster.
Could you ensure this: SnapCenter depends on the proper configuration of the DNS. Therefore, the best practice is to enter the fully qualified domain name (FQDN). If you are adding a host using SnapCenter and it is part of a subdomain, you must provide the FQDN.
It is possible that the problem lies in the resolution names. We have a disjoint Windows namespace: the domain FQDN is "usc.es" but the servers FQDN is "server1.rpso.usc.es" being "rpso.usc.es", not a Windows subdomain , but a DNS zone.
SnapCenter doesn't understand that and insists on always resolving "server1.usc.es" so we have to fool it with a "hosts" file establishiong alias like "server1.usc.es".
But after installing the agents we find this problem.
I think looking at the version of the SnapCenter, you should be able to raise a ticket with NetApp. Have you already raised one regarding this issue ? If not, I suggest please do so, chances are your issue will get resolved sooner.
Also, I come across this KB, talking about DNS issue. I guess you have acces to KBs. Please take a look.