NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

Network and Storage Protocols

cifs.tcp_window_size

jmckenna
5,923 Views

I have read what is on wiki and also on kb.  Along those lines I have also discussed with support changing this setting from 17520 (default setting) to 64240 to improve performance.  I need to know if anyone has run into problems due to changing this or if you have had great success with making this change.

2 REPLIES 2

rtriana
5,923 Views

I have always made it a practice to increase this option from the default of 17520 to the recommended (per kb article and other documentation) to 64240.    This can improve large write transfers.   In any case, windows can "slide" to the appropriate value.   If you leave it at default, it can never be larger than 17520.  But at 64240, it can "slide" down.   I've never heard or experienced any adverse effect from setting this option to 64240.   And years ago, I had a copy of  Network General Sniffer report that graphed the positive improvement of this setting at 64240 as compared to the default 17520.  

This option change will requre a cifs terminate/restart or reboot in order to take effect immediately.

Rick

jmckenna
5,923 Views

Thank you. That helps.

Regards,

Jeff

Public