hello friends, the correct question would be how can I make a modification to an audit policy, where I only need also the size of files to create as well as the rotation. Regards
... View more
Hi, Everyone Thank you for your reply last time. I'm considering the migration separately from the design, so I asked the question. This time, we are considering data migration using Snapmirror. The current configuration is below. A. Production storage (current) Ontap: 9.5P6 FAS8020 Usage for migration: FileServer (CIFS/NFS), ProfileServer (CIFS, NFS) B. Backup storage (current) Ontap: 9.5P6 FAS2554 C. New production storage Ontap 9.11P3 AFF250 Now from A to B, Snapmirror is implemented. In order to avoid the current business impact as much as possible, data migration to the new production storage We are considering migrating from B to C using Snapmirror. (It's a Snapmirror cascade.) I am considering implementing the following flow, but is it correct? Are there any other points to note? 1. Backup storage (current) Ontap version upgrade (9.5 → 9.7) We expect to update to a version that supports Snapmirror to 9.11. Since it is an OEM product and the minimum version that can be downloaded from the support site is 9.7, this version is used. 2. Snapmirror implementation from B to C Create and implement a peer relationship between the cluster and svm. Assuming XDP. Since various operations are performed only on B and C, it is assumed that there will be no operation or impact on A. After version upgrade of B, SnapMIrror from Ontap:9.5(A) to Ontap:9.7(B) is also supported configuration. https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/data-protection/compatible-ontap-versions-snapmirror-concept.html#snapmirror-synchronous-relationships Regards
... View more
We have a fresh built 4 node cluster with just aggr0 and vol0 nothing else has yet been done with it. I have been asked to upgrade it to 8.3 to allow for some testing. The 3rd party guys have left me the upgrade details but I am having some issues getting the image file onto the nodes. Using the command as follows to update the image on node 02 system node image update -node ##########01-02 -package tftp://###.###.###.###/Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz -replace-package true This connects and the tftp download progress can be seen when this reaches completion (On the tftp server the transfer shows as successful) the install fails Install Failed. Failed to download package from tftp://###.###.###.###/Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz. Error: tftp download failed : Verbose mode on.. Verbose mode on.. Verbose mode on.. mode set to octet. mode set to octet. mode set to octet. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. . . . Error: command failed: Install Failed. Failed to download package from tftp://###.###.###.###/Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz. Error: tftp download failed : Verbose mode on.. Verbose mode on.. Verbose mode on.. mode set to octet. mode set to octet. mode set to octet. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. getting from ###.###.###.###:Netapp/83RC2_q_image.tgz to /mroot/etc/software/83RC2_q_image.tgz.downloading [octet]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. Received 482569420 bytes in 666.2 seconds [5794889 bits/sec]. The bytes transfered 482569420 is the file size of the original image file, this has been redownloaded hash checked etc so I am now a bit stuck with what to try next. Are there any logs for this that might shed some light onto why the transfer fails ?
... View more
Hi I have a disk showing (prefail) in the vol status -r If I look at the sasadmin dev_stats out put the disk in question shows 45.3K in the cmd error column A lot of the other disks show 39K in the same column...am I looking at lots of disks heading for prefail? Thanks for any advice/info Phil phil_mather@eu.diodes.com
... View more
