Effective December 3, NetApp adopts Microsoft’s Business-to-Customer (B2C) identity management to simplify and provide secure access to NetApp resources.For accounts that did not pre-register (prior to Dec 3), access to your NetApp data may take up to 1 hour as your legacy NSS ID is synchronized to the new B2C identity.To learn more, read the FAQ and watch the video.Need assistance? Complete this form and select “Registration Issue” as the Feedback Category.
I have a FAS3210A with each head owning a DS4243 shelf of 1 TB SATA drives. Current RAID group size is 16. There are only 18 disk populated in each shelf (6 empty bays). 2 disks are hot spares for each shelf. Here's my question. I have 6 disks to add to each shelf, which will max out the shelf with 24 drives. Do I expand the RAID group size or keep it the same. If I keep it at 16, then I'm only going to get to use 4 out of the 6 drives, b/c it will create new parity drives. If I expand the RAID group size, will this affect performance? How badly will performance be affected? Also, what is the maximum RAID group size for a 3210 with 1 TB SATA drives. We're currently running ONTAP 7.3.5P1 on this cluster, with the idea of upgrading to 8.1.3P2 in the near future.
The maximum RAID group size is 28, yes you can very well expand the current RAID group but you will have to face a little performance challenge. however the performance is not a big concern if you are expanding to 28 RAID group size, the major concern is the resiliency because after expanding it to 28 RAID group size you have more data disk to protect in a less parity drive.
I apologize i though of SAS drives because there the maximum RAID group size is 28. anyways as per your current config i guess you have created 15D+2P+1S. if that is the case then you can add another 6 disk and expand it to 20D+2P+2S.
Yes, david i have just checked in my simulator and it is not possible to go ahead with that config. now i guess you dont have any choice. either you can create new RAID group or you can expand it to 18D+4P+2S with the minimal performance overhead.