ONTAP Hardware

New system setup advice

chris_davis
6,705 Views

I just installed a FAS2240-4 along with 3 DS4246 shelves full of 2 TB SATA disks.

This filer is intended to be used as a SnapMirror destination for my production filer.

My production filer is a 2240-4 with 1 DS4246 shelf.  The filer has 24 2 TB SATA disks carved out for Exchange 2010 and our file servers.  26.19 TB total.
The DS4246 shelf has 24 600 GB SAS disks used for my VMware servers. 8.65 TB total.
One controller of the filer is over the filer's disks, the other controller is for the shelf.

Previously I was backing these up to an older 2040 with one shelf but I replaced that with the 2240 and shelves mentioned above.

I'm looking for advice on how to split up the available space.

The filer is currently configured with half of the filer's disks assigned to one controller and the other half to the other controller.

This is what I'm thinking:

Controller A: Assigned to all of the filer's disks and 2 shelves.  This will give me roughly 72 TB of disk space after RAID-DP and 2 spares are taken out.  I will use this space to receive data from the SATA aggr on the source filer (Exchange and File Server data).

Controller B: Assigned to the 3rd shelf.  I will get about 24 TB from this shelf which will be for my VMware SnapMirror.

What is the best method of reassigning my disks?

The disks for my shelves are currently unassigned and the filer's disks are split between the two controllers.

Is there anything I'm missing that I'm not thinking about?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

resqme914
6,703 Views

I tend to prefer minimal number of large aggregates to having lots of smaller aggregates.  With your environment, which is fairly small, I would say have just one aggregate on controller A (assuming they're all SATA).  Having more disks in the aggregate will give you better performance, in general.

In terms of raid groups (raid-dp), I also tend to go larger and trying to maximize my space.  If I had 72 SATA disks, I would have one raid-dp aggregate, with rg size 17, which will leave 4 spares.  If you don't wish to leave that many spares, you can use rg size 18, but leave two of the raidgroups with only 17 disks each.   HTH.

 

View solution in original post

12 REPLIES 12
Public