Hi Team , we're using physical used capacity to compute various metrics. We've observed that for some volumes, the used capacity and physical used capacity values are the same, while for others, they differ. Here are the details from our NetApp system (version 9.13): ``` A250::> volume show -fields size, available, total, used, physical-used vserver volume size available total used physical-used ------- ---------- ------- --------- ------- ------- ------------- A250-01 vol0 151.3GB 72.74GB 143.7GB 70.99GB 68.25GB A250-02 vol0 151.3GB 77.03GB 143.7GB 66.70GB 62.60GB svm1 Lun_1 2.06GB 2.06GB 2.06GB 632KB 632KB svm1 Lun_test_3 10.30GB 10.30GB 10.30GB 692KB 692KB svm1 svm1_root 1GB 970.3MB 972.8MB 2.48MB 7.96MB ``` We've tried to understand the reasons behind this discrepancies but couldn't get a clear explanation. Could you please help us understand about this volume capacity values. Thank You !
... View more
Hi all, I having an issue on space discrepancies between storage LUN and end host space (LUN that mapped on windows server). After go through some research, I found out that required to enable the space allocation on thin LUN to make host-side space management identifies blocks of data that have been deleted on the host file system allow ONTAP to reclaim space. I've already enable the setting for space allocation and just want to ask few asking here after we enable the feature. 1) After we enable the space allocation feature/setting in the LUNs and already verify the features is already enabled, how long can we can expect to see the reflect of space on the storage LUN will align/tally with the space available in the host end? Please advise as I need to understand what the result we can expect after enabled the space allocation feature. Tahnks
... View more
Hi everyone, We're currently investigating some significant differences in the reported physical used capacity between NetApp versions 9.13 and 9.14 and would appreciate your insights. In version 9.13, when querying the physical used capacity using the CLI command volume show -volume Apr* -fields size,available,total,used,physical-used, we received the following results: vserver volume size available total used physical-used -------- ----------- ------- --------- ------- ----- ------------- NetApp_2 Apr_ss_15gb 17.89GB 17.89GB 17.89GB 340KB 340KB NetApp_2 Apr_ss_70gb 78.86GB 78.86GB 78.86GB 308KB 308KB However, when querying the same information in version 9.14 with the same CLI command, volume show -volume Apr* -fields size,available,total,used,physical-used,we observed a notable increase in the reported physical used capacity: vserver volume size available total used physical-used -------- ----------- ------- --------- ------- ----- ------------- NetApp_2 Apr_ss_15gb 17.89GB 17.89GB 17.89GB 468KB 17.99GB NetApp_2 Apr_ss_70gb 78.86GB 78.86GB 78.86GB 456KB 79.30GB We're trying to understand the reasons behind this discrepancy: What constitutes physical used capacity in NetApp? What changes were made between versions 9.13 and 9.14 that could account for the differences in physical used capacity? What additional data is included in the calculation of physical used capacity in version 9.14 compared to version 9.13? Where can we find documentation or resources detailing these changes to better understand how to interpret the physical used metric in our storage environment? Any insights or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank You.!
... View more
Hello, I would like to create and use local users on the FAS series. Is there a maximum number of local users? Also, is there a maximum number of local groups? If so, how many users and groups can I create?
... View more
Hi All kindly can add one drive in RAID-TEC as hot spare for general system contain from 26 SSD NVMe? is this possible and HOW can do that?
... View more
