NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

Network and Storage Protocols

Recommended Layout for FAS6210 Disk Upgrade

GERNETAPP
3,519 Views

Hi everyone,

     In our environment we have a 6210 with active-active controllers that it´s using SAN and iSCSI connectivity this storage is primarily use for VMware. We recently purchased a shelf of 24 disks of 450GB SAS that are not assigned to any aggrs yet and I want to know what could be the best RG configuration for performance. The system is running ONTAP 8.0P4. The actual configuration is the following:

Aggregate aggr0 (online, raid_dp) (block checksums)
  Plex /aggr0/plex0 (online, normal, active, pool0)
    RAID group /aggr0/plex0/rg0 (normal)

      RAID DiskDevice  HA  SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type  RPM  Used (MB/blks)    Phys (MB/blks)
      ---------------  ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------    --------------
      dparity 1c.00.0 1c    0   0   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      parity  1c.00.1 1c    0   1   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.2 1c    0   2   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.3 1c    0   3   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.4 1c    0   4   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.5 1c    0   5   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.6 1c    0   6   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.7 1c    0   7   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.8 1c    0   8   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.9 1c    0   9   SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448
      data    1c.00.101c    0   10  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448


Pool1 spare disks (empty)

Pool0 spare disks

RAID DiskDevice  HA  SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type  RPM  Used (MB/blks)    Phys (MB/blks)
---------------  ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------    --------------
Spare disks for block or zoned checksum traditional volumes or aggregates
spare   1c.00.111c    0   11  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 418000/856064000  420584/861357448 (not zeroed)

Partner disks

RAID DiskDevice  HA  SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type  RPM  Used (MB/blks)    Phys (MB/blks)
---------------  ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------    --------------
partner 1c.00.131c    0   13  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.231c    0   23  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.171c    0   17  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.181c    0   18  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.201c    0   20  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.221c    0   22  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.211c    0   21  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.161c    0   16  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.151c    0   15  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.141c    0   14  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.121c    0   12  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448
partner 1c.00.191c    0   19  SA:B   0  SAS  15000 0/0               420584/861357448

Any ideas?

I would really apprecitated the help.

Thanks in advance,

German.

1 REPLY 1

dimitrik
3,519 Views

looks like you already have about 12 disks per aggr. You could keep the 12-disk RG size and expand both aggrs by 12 drives each, ending with 2x 12-disk RGs in each aggr.

Or you could pick a controller to expand more than the other, and do something like:

  1. Set the RG size to 18
  2. Pad the existing RG with 6 disks, ending with 18
  3. Add the rest of the 18 disks in an additional RG
  4. Result: Aggr containing 2 RGs, 18+18 disks.
Public