Hi, I have a couple of new A400 systems. After upgrading them to Ontap 9.13.1.P1 I noticed that the health was degraded on the link aggregation port and the member ports.   There are an KB about this, Native vlan ports show degraded after upgrade to ONTAP 9.13.1 - NetApp Knowledge Base   But I don't understand how to solve it, should I create a "native vlan" in the Cisco switches config for the lacp Etherchannel? I seems to just be a cosmetic problem, I can ignore the health status (net port modify -node <node> -port <port> -ignore-health-status true)   This is the status today for one of a new cluster (not in production).  Should the ifgrp ports (a0a, e0e, e0f) be in a broadcast domain?    cl05::> network port ifgrp show -node cl05-01 Port Distribution Active Node IfGrp Function MAC Address Ports Ports -------- ---------- ------------ ----------------- ------- ------------------- cl05-01 a0a ip xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx full e0e, e0f   cl05::> network port show -node cl05-01 Node: cl05-01 Speed(Mbps) Health Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status --------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- -------- a0a Default - up 1500 -/- degraded a0a-10 Default vlan-10 up 1500 -/- healthy a0a-12 Default vlan-12 up 1500 -/- healthy a0a-18 Default vlan-18 up 1500 -/- healthy a0a-1905 Default vlan-1905 up 1500 -/- healthy a0a-20 Default vlan-20 up 1500 -/- healthy a0a-51 Default Default up 1500 -/- healthy e0M Default Default up 1500 auto/1000 healthy e0e Default - up 1500 auto/10000 degraded e0f Default - up 1500 auto/10000 degraded e0g Default - down 1500 auto/- - e0h Default - down 1500 auto/- - e3a Cluster Cluster up 9000 auto/100000 healthy e3b Cluster Cluster up 9000 auto/100000 healthy 14 entries were displayed. cl05::> cl05::> network port reachability show -node cl05-01 Node Port Expected Reachability Reachability Status --------- -------- ------------------------------------ --------------------- cl05-01 a0a - no-reachability a0a-10 Default:vlan-10 ok a0a-12 Default:vlan-12 ok a0a-18 Default:vlan-18 ok a0a-1905 Default:vlan-1905 ok a0a-20 Default:vlan-20 ok a0a-51 Default:Default ok e0M Default:Default ok e0e - no-reachability e0f - no-reachability e0g - no-reachability e0h - no-reachability e3a Cluster:Cluster ok e3b Cluster:Cluster ok ... View more

The AD object shows windows for few Netapp objects in AD , is this a issue from AD side or is it from the Netapp  ... View more

Hi,   We've added an A400 system to our cluster and need its interfaces discovered on one of our Windows Production Servers.  It's zoned correctly and I can see the interfaces are logged in.    Windows is not seeing the new paths, i've created a new lun and mapped it to a new Igroup with the new interfaces binded.  This is a production server and rebooting is currently not an option.    It was suggested through a google search to disable and re-enable MPIO - will this cause any disruptions?   What are my other options?  ... View more

We want to be able to look quickly look through windows logs to see folder permission changes. We've turned on logging where the logs goto a user directory, but they are all "evtx" logs. We can see everything if we use MS Eventviewer, but there are so many, doing a quick search on them for a user, etc. is just about impossible. Since its in the evtx format, I don't seem to be able to text greps on the data.    Does anyone else have this same problem and tackled it with someone besides a SIEM?    Is there a way to simply have the logs sent over in XML verse evtx ? And only with the File/Folder Permission changes instead of every read/write event to them ?  ... View more

Hi,   This is a semi pressing issue where no matter what method I use to install the TGZ update file (server or local), both methods  fail   I'm trying to upgrade from  9.9.1P7 to 9.12.1P4   I'm aware of the following KB: When uploading an OS image from the system manager, request timeout occurs - NetApp Knowledge Base   and    System Manager fails to upload ONTAP image due to insufficient space - NetApp Knowledge Base   But I haven't been able to get it to work. I've also opened up a case with NetApp but they have not gotten back to met yet ... View more