Hello.   I have a simple question.   Our customers are currently using the FAS2720 equipment. I'm trying to convert my equipment into a FAS8300 because I can't expand my 460C Shelf anymore.   So we're going to use all of the disks on the existing FAS2720 on the FAS8300, and we want to make the data operational without a separate migration.   That's how I found the hardware upgrade documentation.   However, the NetApp support document 'Decide where to use the aggregate relocation procedure' does not indicate whether the FAS2720 -> FAS8300 can be supported.   It was only mentioned that it was possible to upgrade from the old 8000 series to the 8200 and 8300 series.   I would like to know if hardware upgrade support from FAS2720 to FAS8300 is possible, and if not, I would like to know if migration is required using 'snapmirror' or 'snapvault'.   Thank you.   ... View more

Hi,   We have sold 10+ A700 recently to our customer, and they are happy with the systems. But they want to buy X90102A Hardware Kit,System De-pop Trays for each system. QE doesn't allow me to add this part using quick add.   My question is how can we quote and buy this part seperately?   Thanks L ... View more

Yes, nice to meet you all. I have hardly touched NETAPP Storage and suddenly the person in charge quit and I have to deal with it. Therefore, I would like your help as my knowledge is limited. The DISK broke and was replaced with a HDD that was used elsewhere in a hurry. At that time, it displayed "badlabel" and I was in a hurry, but I found out that it was displayed like that because the disk was used in another chassis. Then, with the following command, the badlabel was corrected and the disk was recognized.   storage disk unfail -s 1.1.15 Up to this point, there was no problem, but the disk was recognized as a spare, and I think it is different from the original state. Can you please tell me how to restore this to its original state? What is the original state? 1.1.13 3.63TB 1 13 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 1.1.14 3.63TB 1 14 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 1.1.15 3.63TB 1 15 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 1.1.16 3.63TB 1 16 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 It is believed to be. The current status is 1.1.13 3.63TB 1 13 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 1.1.14 3.63TB 1 14 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 1.1.15 3.63TB 1 15 FSAS spare Pool0 main-01 1.1.16 3.63TB 1 16 FSAS aggregate aggr2 main-01 And for information on spares, main::*> storage disk zerospares aggr status -s Original Owner: main-01 Pool0 Spare Pool Usable Physical Disk Type Class RPM Checksum Size Size Status ---------------- ------ ----------- ------ -------------- -------- -------- -------- 1.1.15 FSAS capacity 7200 block 3.63TB 3.64TB zeroed Original Owner: main-01 Pool0 Root-Data Partitioned Spares Local Local Data Root Physical Disk Type Class RPM Checksum Usable Usable Size Status ---------------- ------ ----------- ------ -------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1.0.15 FSAS capacity 7200 block 3.58TB 53.88GB 3.64TB zeroed Original Owner: main-02 Pool0 Root-Data Partitioned Spares Local Local Data Root Physical Disk Type Class RPM Checksum Usable Usable Size Status ---------------- ------ ----------- ------ -------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1.0.22 FSAS capacity 7200 block 0B 53.88GB 3.64TB zeroed 3 entries were displayed.   The information of the spares is as follows. What is wrong? I often maintain RAID on servers, so I did it in the same way. And I am not good at English, so I am using translation software. ... View more

Hi Everyone,    As we know, vmware has vSAN stretched cluster function to build a dual active data center architecture. Howerver, customer would like to build stretched cluster without vSAN. Is it possible to implement vmware stretched cluster through MCCP or SM-BC? Thank you all.   Albert ... View more