NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

ONTAP Hardware

changing priority of the disk reconstruction

xuanchel
5,023 Views

Hello,

 

I got a question from customer and don't know how to explain it. Is there any document or idea to answer this question?

 

Question:

what if there is a situation like the disk reconstruction is being proceed  and this process give an impact to the performance of foreground I/O.

Will foreground I/O get less performance impact if changing value of raid.reconstruct.perf_impact  to low during disk reconstruction? Or the change will be reflected in the disk reconstruction.

 

cluster1::> storage raid-options modify -node * -name raid.reconstruct.perf_impact -value low

 

5 REPLIES 5

akiendl
5,013 Views

ONTAP does automatically make sure that a reconstruct has no impact. In the incredibly rare events it has you can use the option but I have not seen it needed in years.

xuanchel
5,008 Views

Customer know the reconstruction have no impact but they still want to know if changing the value of the   raid.reconstruct.perf_impact to low will directly reflect to the disk reconstruction that is being proceed.

DarrenJ
4,999 Views

Check this KB.

https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/How_to_increase_priority_for_disk_reconstruction

 

Low

  • The storage system uses very little of the system resources.
  • This setting lightly affects storage system performance.
  • Reconstruction takes longer to complete, increasing the time that the storage system is running in degraded mode.

 

In short, setting it to low will slow down reconstruction.  

paul_stejskal
4,986 Views

I've never got a conclusive answer but I've heard that in newer versions of ONTAP this was fixed. In older versions it was a RFE to be dynamic during a disk reconstruct but never got any traction.

JonathanGaudette
4,980 Views
Low=less impact to frontend clients (and slower reconstruct speed)
Public