Dear community, the following entry can be found in the event log of our FAS2750 (ONTAP 9.13.N) "mgmtgwd.certificate.expired: A digital certificate with Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) nnnnnnnn-911f-47c7-b1c1-nnnnnnnnnnnn, Serial Number nnnnnnnn, Certificate Authority 'nnnnnnnn-911f-47c7-b1c1-nnnnnnnnnnnn' and type client for Vserver FASxxxxxx has expired." The certificate has expired and is no longer needed because the affected AIQUM host no longer exists and has been replaced by another one (with new hostname). The problem is that the certificate cannot be deleted because the old AIQUM host no longer exists: The certificate could not be removed due to the following conflicts: The certificate issued by "nnnnnnnn-911f-47c7-b1c1-nnnnnnnnnnn" with serial number "nnnnnnnn" is in use by the rest-api EMS destination "hostname-bbbbb-de_server" and cannot be removed. The listed destination no longer exists - how can I delete the certificate entry anyway? Any Idea? Thanks Best regards Michael
... View more
Question about Active IQ Unified Manager Version: 9.14 Does anyone have an idea on how we might go about creating a notification on these two events: wafl.vol.autoSize.done wafl.vol.autoSize.fail We use auto grow throughout our environment and are reliant on getting notified each time a volume grows so that we can manage our volume autosize settings to make sure that volumes can continue to grow.
... View more
What are the latest versions of MySQL that will AIQUM 9.13 and later support. I suspect MySQL community will discontinue the 8.0.x line soon and MySQL 8.4.0 is now available. I haven't seen any references to MySQL DB in IMT beyond 5.7x. Thanks
... View more
Hi everyone, We're currently investigating some significant differences in the reported physical used capacity between NetApp versions 9.13 and 9.14 and would appreciate your insights. In version 9.13, when querying the physical used capacity using the CLI command volume show -volume Apr* -fields size,available,total,used,physical-used, we received the following results: vserver volume size available total used physical-used -------- ----------- ------- --------- ------- ----- ------------- NetApp_2 Apr_ss_15gb 17.89GB 17.89GB 17.89GB 340KB 340KB NetApp_2 Apr_ss_70gb 78.86GB 78.86GB 78.86GB 308KB 308KB However, when querying the same information in version 9.14 with the same CLI command, volume show -volume Apr* -fields size,available,total,used,physical-used,we observed a notable increase in the reported physical used capacity: vserver volume size available total used physical-used -------- ----------- ------- --------- ------- ----- ------------- NetApp_2 Apr_ss_15gb 17.89GB 17.89GB 17.89GB 468KB 17.99GB NetApp_2 Apr_ss_70gb 78.86GB 78.86GB 78.86GB 456KB 79.30GB We're trying to understand the reasons behind this discrepancy: What constitutes physical used capacity in NetApp? What changes were made between versions 9.13 and 9.14 that could account for the differences in physical used capacity? What additional data is included in the calculation of physical used capacity in version 9.14 compared to version 9.13? Where can we find documentation or resources detailing these changes to better understand how to interpret the physical used metric in our storage environment? Any insights or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank You.!
... View more
