NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions

vserver.comment in cm_storage empty?

bloehlein
4,220 Views

Hi,

I'm working on a workflow to provision volumes to several cDOT systems and all Vservers have appropriate comments what is hosted in them, e.g.:

vserver    comment

------------ ----------------------------

vserver1 "ESXi Server"

vserver2 "ESXi Desktop"

vserver3 "Databases"

The field vserver.comment in the cm_storage scheme seems to be empty, is there any other chance to get the comment values?

Best regards,

Bernd

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

sinhaa
4,220 Views

Bernd,

      What is your OCUM version? The thing is currently no OC Unified Version ( 5.x or 6.0 ) monitors and stores this "comment" field for the vservers and WFA acquires Data from what is seen by OCUM. Hence this field is currently set to Null by WFA.

Perhaps in future if OCUM starts to monitor/store this "comment" information of the vservers, WFA cache queries maybe will get modified to acquire it.

warm regards,

Abhishek

If this post resolved your issue, help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

sinhaa
4,221 Views

Bernd,

      What is your OCUM version? The thing is currently no OC Unified Version ( 5.x or 6.0 ) monitors and stores this "comment" field for the vservers and WFA acquires Data from what is seen by OCUM. Hence this field is currently set to Null by WFA.

Perhaps in future if OCUM starts to monitor/store this "comment" information of the vservers, WFA cache queries maybe will get modified to acquire it.

warm regards,

Abhishek

If this post resolved your issue, help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.

bloehlein
4,220 Views

Hi Abhishek,

thanks for the info, I've forgot to mention it's OCUM 6.0RC1... Hopefully OCUM will query this fields in the near future

Best regards,

Bernd

Public