Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Team
We need some clarification regarding volume capacity values .
we're using physical used capacity to compute various metrics. We've observed that for some volumes, the used capacity and physical used capacity values are the same, while for others, they differ.
Here are the details from our NetApp system (version 9.13):
```
A250::> volume show -fields size, available, total, used, physical-used
vserver volume size available total used physical-used
------- ---------- ------- --------- ------- ------- -------------
A250-01 vol0 151.3GB 72.74GB 143.7GB 70.99GB 68.25GB
A250-02 vol0 151.3GB 77.03GB 143.7GB 66.70GB 62.60GB
svm1 Lun_1 2.06GB 2.06GB 2.06GB 632KB 632KB
svm1 Lun_test_3 10.30GB 10.30GB 10.30GB 692KB 692KB
svm1 svm1_root 1GB 970.3MB 972.8MB 2.48MB 7.96MB
```
We've tried to understand the reasons behind these discrepancies but couldn't get a clear explanation.
Could you please help us understand this .
Thank You!
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The used (or used size ) indicate the total logical size that is used in the volume and it includes the de-duplicated data,compressed state , compacted data and the reclaimable data that is there in the lun /volume.
while the physical size is the actual phyiscal block that the data is using on the volume (read it like the data is is used on the phyiscal disk).
---
