Hi I have centos7 box NFS Qtree used for home dir from Netapp is able to mount just fine Exoport policy shows : any any any ...ie super user access as well is any When i am root user on client box , can cd to user home dir of any user We have SSSD setup & use can login with AD id when the normal user login The home dir of the user is not able to mount & error is ## su - userxxxx Last login: Fri Feb 26 19:17:03 EST 2021 from s... su: warning: cannot change directory to .../..: Permission denied -bash: .../.bash_profile: Permission denied -bash-4.2$ Here is tcpdump shows ### tcpdump -s 192 port nfs -i ens192 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on ens192, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 192 bytes     19:13:34.696861 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [S], seq 4251450372, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 1258809 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:13:34.697147 IP NetappXXXX.com.nfs > CLIENTXXX.busboy: Flags [S.], seq 3336189244, ack 4251450373, win 65535, options [mss 8960,nop,wscale 8,sackOK,TS val 1699851922 ecr 1258809], length 0 19:13:34.697169 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [.], ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 1258809 ecr 1699851922], length 0 19:13:34.697184 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [P.], seq 1:137, ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 1258809 ecr 1699851922], length 136: NFS request xid 2803191295 132 access [|nfs] 19:13:34.707092 IP NetappXXXX.com.nfs > CLIENTXXX.busboy: Flags [P.], seq 1:125, ack 137, win 257, options [nop,nop,TS val 1699851932 ecr 1258809], length 124: NFS reply xid 2803191295 reply ok 120 access c 0003 19:13:34.707101 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [.], ack 125, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 1258819 ecr 1699851932], length 0 19:13:34.707147 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [P.], seq 137:281, ack 125, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 1258819 ecr 1699851932], length 144: NFS request xid 2819968511 140 lookup [|nfs] 19:13:34.707621 IP NetappXXXX.com.nfs > CLIENTXXX.busboy: Flags [P.], seq 125:389, ack 281, win 257, options [nop,nop,TS val 1699851932 ecr 1258819], length 264: NFS reply xid 2819968511 reply ok 260 lookup fh Unknown/01000000A916668000000000F0F93B00CEC24854A91666800000000061000000 19:13:34.747554 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [.], ack 389, win 237, options [nop,nop,TS val 1258860 ecr 1699851932], length 0 19:14:34.799582 IP CLIENTXXX.busboy > NetappXXXX.com.nfs: Flags [.], ack 389, win 237, options [nop,nop,TS val 1318912 ecr 1699851932], length 0 19:14:34.799848 IP NetappXXXX.com.nfs > CLIENTXXX.busboy: Flags [.], ack 281, win 257, options [nop,nop,TS val 1699912024 ecr 1258860], length 0   ####################################### fstab entry :- xxx:/vol_home/home xxx nfs vers=3,bg,soft,retrans=4 0 0 ####################################### mount options from client end mount -v |grep -i nfs sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw,relatime) xx:/vol_home/home on xx type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,soft,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=4,sec=sys,mountaddr=xxx,mountvers=3,mountport=635,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=xxx) ####################################### Any suggestions Please   ... View more

Hello,   I have setup a 2 node cluster across 2 VM's - I attempt to SSH into the mgmt interface via PuTTY and I receive "Error: Connection Refused" - I am able to ping the address assigned to mgmt interface. I am using the admin account and as far as I Know the access rights for SSH are enabled by default? is there somthing else I must to do in order to SSH to this?     any help/advice is appreciated.   Thanks ... View more

I am Scott Peiffer, Sr. Director from the ONTAP System Manager Product Management & Technical Marketing team. Thank you to our many passionate customers and partners for sharing your feedback on System Manager 9.8. This post is to provide you with background on the changes being made to ONTAP, information on how to learn more about these changes, and guidance on how best to provide feedback to NetApp. ONTAP System Manager simplification is to directly address your changing needs as you work to support larger data sets, with new applications while expanding into hybrid multi-cloud environments. The simplification effort has been data driven. Significant time was spent on determining and setting smart defaults based on NetApp best practices, automating, and simplifying many of the everyday tasks, and then prioritized workflows that were most frequently used. Since ONTAP provides AIQ with metrics on feature usage, we were able to understand what features our customer use most and what is infrequently used. The feedback that has been received is being considered and prioritized. To be transparent, there are other items which will not be addressed as they are considered complex, infrequent, or unneeded based on our desire to provide our customers with self-managing storage. We also hear analysts, for example Gartner stating by 2023, 60% of organizations will use infrastructure automation tools as part of their DevOps toolchains, and improve application deployment efficiency by 25%. (source: Market Guide for Infrastructure Automation Tools, May 2020). API driven integrations will be essential to our customers success. Anecdotally, we have heard in our virtual EBCs that many of our globals and large enterprise customers are managing their infrastructure with tools such as Service Now and Remedy, and even homegrown tools that consolidate service management across various vendors in their data center, all based on API services. There are a number of such tools that operate in infrastructure and application context that we are looking to support... To aid you in this transition we have published an extensive set of documents here: https://community.netapp.com/t5/Tech-ONTAP-Blogs/Where-can-I-learn-more-about-System-Manager-9-8/ba-p/162249   Please continue to share your feedback though your NetApp account teams! This is how we can best aggregate feedback, address your needs and respond. Help us along this journey with your improvement suggestions. Sincerely, Ravi Chhabria (VP Engineering) Scott Peiffer (Sr. Director ONTAP System Manager Product Management & Technical Marketing) ... View more

Hi Team,   Would there be any problems with this? The idea is to have 30 days of snapshots on both the primary and the secondary site, but the primary has an AFF tiering with a Snapshot-Only policy to a FAS object tier and the secondary is a FAS8200. Since SnapMirror is only sending changes, I'm assuming that the replication engine wouldn't have any issues with the cold data blocks in the object tier, but I want to make sure.    Thanks! ... View more