Hi Everyone..
Actually we have FAS2240 with Data Ontap 8.1.4P1 7-Mode and Filer-A had failed. So we have replaced with New one.
But unfortunately forgot to swap Flash Card from failed filer to new filer.
In result the New Filer is having Ontap 8.2P3 7-Mode has been configured that newer version then we have in out system.
So system is running but Takeover feature has been disabled due to ontap mismatch.
strga> cf status
strgb is up, takeover disabled because of reason (version mismatch)
strga has disabled takeover by strgb (version mismatch)
NVRAM TOC: Local 29 Partner 23
WAFL FSInfo: Local 23589 Partner 22331
WAFL log: Local 396 Partner 334
RAID: Local 12 Partner 11
RAID NVRAM: Local 42 Partner 33
VIA Interconnect is up (link up).
So now we have two options here, one need to upgrade Filer-B to 8.2P3 or downgrade Filer-A to 8.1.4P1.
But to perform both we need those Ontap Firmware. we have tried to search Netapp Support but unable to find any version blow 8.5
So I need help here if someone pls share link to download above version will be really helpful to me
Thank You
... View more
If I want to apply the qos policy in the LUN level Should it must also apply in the Volume that include the LUN at the same time? or just apply in the LUN Level only ?
... View more
Trying to run a cluster update from 9.4P3 to 9.4P5 via System Manager on a newly installed FAS2720. Get the attached error when upgrade process is trying to download the image to the nodes. We have verified all steps outlined in the error including re-downloading the 9.4P5 image from NetApp support site and still get the error. Verified the checksum on the downloaded image and it looks good. Tried a direct update of the image via HTTP from the web server on my laptop using "system node image update" and get the same error. I know that the image on my laptop is good as I upgraded another customer's system with it 2 days earlier.
... View more
Hello All, I think I have just been looking at this too long and it is an easy answer, but I have an aggregate that has 5954GB physical used and a volume in that aggregate that has 7903GB physical used. How is the physical volume larger than the aggregate? I have looked at all the efficiencies and they add up independently, I just can't make the math above work. If anyone can point me in the right direction to see how this is possible I would be very grateful. I can provide more output if needed. Thanks!
... View more
