Options
- Mark all as New
- Mark all as Read
- Float this item to the top
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Threaded format
- Linear Format
- Sort by Topic Start Date
Board Activity
Hi, We have HA Controllers/Node model: FAS2552 with one DS2246 with SAS HDDs; we are adding two new shelves model: DS2246 with total of 24 SSD. Should we create two new Aggregates (11 disk each + spare) in order to distribute the loads on two controllers (Active/Active). Is it possible to create one aggregates to include all disks while I still can have Active/Active? I saw some discussion about ADP which may include all 22 disks + spares and sharing two Aggregates by partitioning. However, I can't find the procedures to do that. Thanks Aldous
... View more
By AldousContributorONTAP Discussions
35m ago
17 Views
0
0
I am not sure if this is the correct forum, but I did see other posts about NetApp volumes here. Please advise of the correct forum if needed. On the Google Cloud Platform, I deployed a STANDARD service level 2048gb NetApp storagepool in uscentral1. Then I created a 100gb volume also in uscentral1. I have a question about this volume's performance. When I use the FIND command to traverse through a directory, the performance is noticeably slower on the Netapp volume versus the same data on the local drive. At first I was thinking I needed to increase my throughput performance by increasing my service level or making the volume bigger(which increases throughput performance). But after thinking about it, my FIND command is not moving data, it's just traversing through the directory. So it seems this is not a throughput issue? Does anyone have insight as to the performance issue here: root@server1:~# time find /data_local/cache/4c71-4cb6-bd50-d80aa7/ -type f | wc -l 4995 real 0m0.119s user 0m0.058s sys 0m0.059s root@server1:~# time find /data_NetappVol/cache/4c71-4cb6-bd50-d80aa7/ -type f | wc -l 4995 real 0m3.968s user 0m0.078s sys 0m0.219s
... View more
By TacomaContributorONTAP Discussions2025-02-0506:54 AM
2,336 Views
0
8
Greetings NetApp Community, I'm working on a MetroCluster setup with two (NetApp AFF A220) across two sites (3KM distance). We'll utilize a 100Gb DWDM link. However, our ONTAP version (v13.1) doesn't seem to support NetApp CN1610 switches. I've reviewed the compatibility list (https://mysupport.netapp.com/info/communications/ECMLP2859128.html) and see mostly Nexus switches listed. We have a Cisco Nexus N9K-C93180YC-EX available. Would this be a suitable cluster interconnect even if it's not explicitly listed? Any guidance on best switch options would be greatly appreciated.
... View more
By jmeshalContributorONTAP Discussions2024-03-1312:49 PM
1,159 Views
0
2
Dear Netapp experts! Could you please help us troubleshoot the following error? Issue: Unexpected NDMP error communicating with tape server (it is Commvault Media Agent server] Detailed description : Our NDMP backup runs very slowly (approximately 2MB/Sec) and eventually enters a pending state with the error above. Has anyone experienced this issue or have any insights? How to troubleshoot failing and slow NDMP connection?
... View more
By Jerry2Occasional ContributorONTAP Discussions
2 weeks ago
325 Views
0
2
I'm about to upgrade our SnapCenter infrastructure from 5.0P2 to 6.1P1, with the exception of five SQL Servers running Windows Server 2008R2 and 2012R2 [and yes we are pushing them to migrate to new servers]. Those Windows versions can't run SC 6.x [or for that matter some of the new prerequisites like the new PowerShell version requirement]. The problem: I just discovered that the IMT indicates that both 6.0.1 and 6.1 running on the SC server is not compatible with 5.x Windows or SQL plug-ins. I could upgrade only to 6.0 I suppose, which can run the Windows 5.x plug-in and possibly the SQL one [I say possibly because the online documentation and IMT for the plug-in say the SQL 5.x plug-in is compatible, but the IMT for the server says it is not]. Any suggestions? Is 6.0 sufficiently stable without going to 6.0.1 or 6.1? Is 6.0 in fact compatible with the SQL 5.x plug-in?
... View more
By TMADOCTHOMASTop Community AdviserONTAP Discussions
2 weeks ago
- Tags:
- SnapCenter
777 Views
0
4