Options
- Mark all as New
- Mark all as Read
- Float this item to the top
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Threaded format
- Linear Format
- Sort by Topic Start Date
Board Activity
I received this error: "vifmgr.lifs.noredundancy: No redundancy in the failover configuration for 2 LIFs...This message occurs when one or more logical interfaces (LIFs) are configured to use a failover policy that implies failover to one or more ports but have no failover targets beyond their home ports." The error applies to the node management LIFs on the two nodes (node1_mgmt, node2_mgmt) and also the two custom replication LIFs I created (node1_replication, node2_replication). The replication LIFs are talking to a NetApp in a different datacenter. Here are the failover settings for the node management LIFs: Logical Home Failover Failover Vserver Interface Node:Port Policy Group -------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------------- Clus node1_mgmt node1:e0M local-only Management Failover Targets: node1:e0M node2_mgmt node2:e0M local-only Management Failover Targets: node2:e0M The replication LIFs have a similar config: Logical Home Failover Failover Vserver Interface Node:Port Policy Group ------- --------------- ------------- ---------- --------------- Repl node1_replication_dcpn node1:e0e-202 local-only Repl_VLAN_202 Failover Targets: node1:e0e-202 node2_replication_dcpn node2:e0e-202 local-only Repl_VLAN_202 Failover Targets: node2:e0e-202 Here are the failover group settings: Vserver Group Targets ------- ---------- -------------------------------------------- Clus Management node1:e0M, node2:e0M Repl Repl_VLAN_202 node1:e0e-202, node2:e0e-202 As far as I can tell, the error is occurring because "Failover Targets" shows only one target for each LIF — the LIF's home port. Is there something I've missed here? Something I need to do to tell it that it can failover those LIFs to the corresponding ports on the other node? Or, looking at it a different way: is it even possible for management and replication (i.e. intecluster) LIFs to failover? If not, then is there something I need to change so that this alert condition will ignore these LIFs?
... View more
By HUX20002000Occasional ContributorONTAP Discussions
Monday
144 Views
0
2
Hi Team, I recently created an NVMe Namespace, and during the process, an associated volume was automatically created. Below are the details: NVMe Namespace Path: /vol/namespace_nvme/namespace_nvme_1 Associated Volume: namespace_nvme I’m trying to understand the performance differences between the NVMe namespace (/vol/namespace_nvme/namespace_nvme_1) and the associated volume (namespace_nvme). Specifically, is the performance of the NVMe namespace the same as that of the associated volume, or are there key differences in how each performs? Looking forward to your insights! Thank you!
... View more
By vemusContributorONTAP Discussions
3 weeks ago
279 Views
0
2
Hi All, Does anyone know how to regenerate a new certificate? I can't find command to recertificate it.
... View more
By NeoLifeContributorONTAP Discussions2024-03-2410:43 PM
743 Views
0
2
hi, This certificate is going to expire next month. I'm very panicked and worried that it will affect my use after its expiration. If someone could know what would happen to him after his expiration, for example: the scope of influence; Will it cause various applications to be unusable, etc.
... View more
By AshunCommunity AdviserONTAP Discussions
Thursday
219 Views
0
2
Hi, We have HA Controllers/Node model: FAS2552 with one DS2246 with SAS HDDs; we are adding two new shelves model: DS2246 with total of 24 SSD. Should we create two new Aggregates (11 disk each + spare) in order to distribute the loads on two controllers (Active/Active). Is it possible to create one aggregates to include all disks while I still can have Active/Active? I saw some discussion about ADP which may include all 22 disks + spares and sharing two Aggregates by partitioning. However, I can't find the procedures to do that. Thanks Aldous
... View more
By AldousContributorONTAP Discussions
a week ago
294 Views
0
4