NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

ONTAP Hardware

Flexclone process can take a long time

GRAEMEOGDEN
4,386 Views

I'm curious to know what factors can impact the speed of the flexclone and volume creation process?

We have a Powershell script which takes a flexclone of an SQL database every 30 minutes. By running "snap list <volname>" I can see the snapshot is taken instantly - as expected. However the volume creation from that snapshot can take anywhere from 2 minutes to 20 minutes. By the time the LUN contained within the flexcloned volume is mounted to the server, the script can sometimes have been running for 35-40 minutes which means the next job is skipped.

During working hours, CPU usage on the filer is around 60% on average, so I doubt this is having such an impact on time to create a volume? There are no snapmirrors running at the same time and de-dup operations are scheduled out of hours....

Any thoughts?

Thanks

3 REPLIES 3

Jeff_Yao
4,386 Views

this is really hard to say. if it's split, easy to understand. it's copying data out from snapshot. but i think u r not talking about that.

so it is best to open a case and collect some perfstat to analyse it.

Jeff

GRAEMEOGDEN
4,386 Views

I noticed there were a lot of 'dead' FC paths on the ESXi host, rescanning the HBAs removed these and seemed to speed up the process of mounting a flex clone to the Guest OS. Not sure why!

BOUCHERPHILIPPE
4,386 Views

Hi

I ve the same problem with a FAS 3240 with Dataontap 8.1 ( and 8.1P3 )  .Randomly , flexclone process take a long time to complete . We have experimented this problem with the following command  ( vol clone create , vol offline <clone_volume> , vol destroy <clone_volume> ) .

Ha ve you solve  this problem , If yes  , I'm very very interested to know that you have do

Regards

Public