Hello,
We have recently adquired a FAS2240 dual controller running 8.2P2, options cf.takeover as follow on both nodes:
cf.takeover.bypass_optimization off
cf.takeover.change_fsid on
cf.takeover.detection.seconds 15
cf.takeover.on_disk_shelf_miscompare off
cf.takeover.on_failure on
cf.takeover.on_network_interface_failure off
cf.takeover.on_network_interface_failure.policy all_nics (same value in local+partner recommended)
cf.takeover.on_panic on
cf.takeover.on_reboot off
cf.takeover.on_short_uptime on
cf.takeover.use_mcrc_file off (value might be overwritten in takeover)
cf.takeover.bypass_optimization off
cf.takeover.change_fsid on
cf.takeover.detection.seconds 15
cf.takeover.on_disk_shelf_miscompare off
cf.takeover.on_failure on
cf.takeover.on_network_interface_failure off
cf.takeover.on_network_interface_failure.policy all_nics (same value in local+partner recommended)
cf.takeover.on_panic on
cf.takeover.on_reboot off
cf.takeover.on_short_uptime on
cf.takeover.use_mcrc_file off (value might be overwritten in takeover)
Local
Adapter Type State Status
---------------------------------------------------
1a initiator CONFIGURED. offline
1b target CONFIGURED online
Local
Adapter Type State Status
---------------------------------------------------
1a initiator CONFIGURED. offline
1b target CONFIGURED online
We presented a 50GB LUN to a Linux box, when we do disconnect the FC cable from one of the controllers, the one that owns a LUN, it does not automatically failover to the other controller but instead the Linux box stops seeing the LUN.
is it possible to have the HA configuration takeover when a FC link is down? We have a single path per controller, so if we loose that path everything goes down.
Thank you
