The transition to NetApp MS Azure AD B2C is complete. If you missed the pre-registration, you will be invited to reigister at next log in.
Please note that access to your NetApp data may take up to 1 hour.
To learn more, read the FAQ and watch the video.
Need assistance? Complete this form and select “Registration Issue” as the Feedback Category.

Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions

OCI DWH 7.1.2 Question on chargeback reporting

JBARBALACE

Hello,

I'm trying to get a bit of insight as to whether or not OCI can provide a chargeback report for hosts that are replicating to our DR site.  The example would be is that we have a host in production that is being replicated via Recoverpoint (RPA) to a DR site.  How does a chargeback report reflect the host replication?  

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

moechnig

I believe that we will be unable to recognize the replication relationship in this configuration because it is defined in RecoverPoint. 

 

Engineering is currently working to define how RecoverPoint might be supported in a future release.  It would be a good idea to make sure your use case is described in detail in an IFR. 

 

There are always two approaches available to accommodate repliation in chargeback.  The first is to measure capacity at both the primary and secondary and associate it with the charged entity.  One drawback to this approach is that OCI must understand the replication relationship, which is challenging if the replication paradigm involves regularly breaking off the secondary, or if replication is defined off of the array.

 

The second is to measure only on the primary side.  In this approach you have some additional options:

- estimate secondary capacity information based on prior knowledge of the replication paradigm; or

- price replication services into the storage tier

If you do estimate the secondary or its cost, you do need to make sure you don't accidentally include some secondary storage in the measurements that are used for chargeback. 

 

HTH. 

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

moechnig

I believe that we will be unable to recognize the replication relationship in this configuration because it is defined in RecoverPoint. 

 

Engineering is currently working to define how RecoverPoint might be supported in a future release.  It would be a good idea to make sure your use case is described in detail in an IFR. 

 

There are always two approaches available to accommodate repliation in chargeback.  The first is to measure capacity at both the primary and secondary and associate it with the charged entity.  One drawback to this approach is that OCI must understand the replication relationship, which is challenging if the replication paradigm involves regularly breaking off the secondary, or if replication is defined off of the array.

 

The second is to measure only on the primary side.  In this approach you have some additional options:

- estimate secondary capacity information based on prior knowledge of the replication paradigm; or

- price replication services into the storage tier

If you do estimate the secondary or its cost, you do need to make sure you don't accidentally include some secondary storage in the measurements that are used for chargeback. 

 

HTH. 

View solution in original post

JBARBALACE

Ok, thanks very much for the info.  If we had a data source for the RecoverPoint that would be fantastic.  I'll report back to my team and perhaps we can put together an IFR.  When it comes to chargeback, being able to see all the pieces is key.

 

Regards,

Julia

 

 

Announcements
NetApp on Discord Image

We're on Discord, are you?

Live Chat, Watch Parties, and More!

Explore Banner

Meet Explore, NetApp’s digital sales platform

Engage digitally throughout the sales process, from product discovery to configuration, and handle all your post-purchase needs.

NetApp Insights to Action
I2A Banner
Public